Sinha Birendra K, Watson David C
Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Psychol Psychother. 2004 Mar;77(Pt 1):55-66. doi: 10.1348/147608304322874254.
This research examined the relative contribution of 20 defence mechanisms assessed by the 40-item Defence Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40) as discriminating variables in predicting membership in personality disorder (PD) clusters. The odd, dramatic and anxious clusters of DSM-III-R and the detached, dependent, independent and ambivalent groups of Millon were used as PD types. PDs were assessed by the Coolidge Axis II Inventory and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II in a non-clinical sample. Results of discriminant function analysis provide empirical support for the usefulness of both DSM and Millon classification schemes. The DSM's odd cluster and Millon's ambivalent types are classified most accurately with the CATI. The MCMI-II classifies most accurately the DSM's odd and dramatic, and Millon's independent and ambivalent, personality types.
本研究考察了通过40项防御方式问卷（DSQ - 40）评估的20种防御机制作为区分变量在预测人格障碍（PD）集群成员资格方面的相对贡献。DSM - III - R的古怪、戏剧化和焦虑集群以及米隆的超脱、依赖、独立和矛盾组被用作PD类型。在一个非临床样本中，通过柯立芝轴II量表和米隆临床多轴量表II对PD进行评估。判别函数分析的结果为DSM和米隆分类方案的有用性提供了实证支持。使用计算机辅助电话访谈（CATI）能最准确地对DSM的古怪集群和米隆的矛盾类型进行分类。米隆临床多轴量表II能最准确地对DSM的古怪和戏剧化类型以及米隆的独立和矛盾人格类型进行分类。
