Kramer Michael, Völker Hans-Ullrich, Weikert Eva, Katzmaier Peter, Sterk Jürgen, Willy Christian, Gerngross Heinz, Kinzl Lothar, Hartwig Erich
Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Ulm, Steinhövelstrasse 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 2004 Oct;13(6):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0617-9. Epub 2004 Mar 18.
The anatomic proof of a spinal compartment and the clinical symptoms of compartment syndrome in patients with chronic back pain are inconsistent with the rarely met measuring criteria of intramuscular pressure (IMP). Previous studies assume a dependence of the IMP on spinal alignment (degree of lumbar spine flexion) and the degree of muscle activation. The significance of these disturbance variables in the interpretation of IMP could explain the above discrepancy. This study therefore investigates the influence of both a 30% increase in trunk flexion and alterations in muscle contraction from 100% to 60%. Sixteen healthy subjects participated in the study. The IMP and mean rectified amplitude of the multifidus surface EMG signal were determined at rest and 0 degrees and approximately 30 degrees of lumbar spine flexion, and they were compared. Subsequently, both parameters were measured during both 100% and 60% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the muscle and then correlated. During rest and 0 degrees flexion, the median IMP was 9.3 mmHg (range 0.0-22.5) while the median mean rectified amplitude (MRA) of the EMG signal was 1.98 microV (range 1.32-7.38). In 30 degrees flexion, the median IMP went up to 24.3 mmHg (range 1.4-97.3) with hardly any increase in the median MRA of 2.32 microV (range 1.20-9.72). Under 60% MVC, the median IMP rose to 186.6 mmHg (range 15.4-375.4) and the median MRA to 21.02 microV (range 4.63-43.63). During 100% MVC, the median MRA increased to 34.38 microV (range 12.99-102.54) while the median IMP rose to 273.4 mmHg (range 90.4-395.1). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the IMP and MRA quotients of the 100/60% MVC values was r= -0.21. To sum up, it can be said that IMP was subject to great interindividual variation in all the experiments. This parameter is highly dependent on spinal alignment and muscular activity. Further studies are needed so that the IMP can be interpreted properly when diagnosing a chronic compartment of the erector spinae muscles.
慢性背痛患者脊髓腔室的解剖学证据和腔室综合征的临床症状与罕见的肌内压(IMP)测量标准不一致。先前的研究假设IMP依赖于脊柱排列(腰椎前屈程度)和肌肉激活程度。这些干扰变量在IMP解释中的意义可以解释上述差异。因此,本研究调查了躯干前屈增加30%以及肌肉收缩从100%改变至60%的影响。16名健康受试者参与了该研究。在休息、腰椎前屈0度和大约30度时测定IMP和多裂肌表面肌电图信号的平均整流幅度,并进行比较。随后,在肌肉100%和60%最大自主收缩(MVC)期间测量这两个参数,然后进行相关性分析。在休息和0度前屈时,IMP中位数为9.3 mmHg(范围0.0 - 22.5),而肌电图信号的平均整流幅度(MRA)中位数为1.98 μV(范围1.32 - 7.38)。在30度前屈时,IMP中位数升至24.3 mmHg(范围1.4 - 97.3),而MRA中位数几乎没有增加,为2.32 μV(范围1.20 - 9.72)。在60%MVC下,IMP中位数升至186.6 mmHg(范围15.4 - 375.4),MRA中位数升至21.02 μV(范围4.63 - 43.63)。在100%MVC期间,MRA中位数增加至34.38 μV(范围12.99 - 102.54),而IMP中位数升至273.4 mmHg(范围90.4 - 395.1)。100/60%MVC值的IMP和MRA商的斯皮尔曼等级相关系数为r = -0.21。总之,可以说在所有实验中IMP存在很大的个体间差异。该参数高度依赖于脊柱排列和肌肉活动。需要进一步研究以便在诊断竖脊肌慢性腔室时能够正确解释IMP。