• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对注射吸毒者进行丙型肝炎筛查:成本效用分析。

Screening for Hepatitis C in injecting drug users: a cost utility analysis.

作者信息

Stein Ken, Dalziel Kim, Walker Andrew, Jenkins Becky, Round Alison, Royle Pam

机构信息

Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Dean Clarke House, Southernhay East, Exeter EX1 1PQ.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Mar;26(1):61-71. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh109.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdh109
PMID:15044577
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major public health problem of increasing importance among injecting drug users, among whom screening has been proposed. We therefore estimated the cost utility of screening for hepatitis C infection among people with a history of injecting drug use in contact with drug misuse services.

METHODS

A spreadsheet-based model of screening using ELISA followed by polymerase chain reaction tests and treatment using combination therapy with interferon alpha and ribavirin was developed. Parameters were informed by literature review, expert opinion and a survey of current screening practice in England. A range of one-way sensitivity analyses were carried out to explore uncertainty in the results for cost effectiveness.

RESULTS

Screening for HCV is likely to yield benefits in the population concerned at around 28,000 pounds per quality adjusted life year. This estimate is reasonably stable when explored in extensive one-way sensitivity analysis but appeared sensitive to the proportion of HCV positive people who accept biopsy or treatment and the utility gains associated with successful drug treatment. Important other areas of uncertainty include the effects of mortality from other causes on the cost effectiveness of screening in this population and the time at which symptoms would have led to presentation in the absence of a screening programme.

CONCLUSION

Screening for HCV in this population is moderately cost effective, although some caution must remain in accepting this estimate given the current uncertainties in this field, and further research is required.

摘要

背景

丙型肝炎是一个日益重要的主要公共卫生问题,在注射吸毒者中尤为突出,有人提议对这一群体进行筛查。因此,我们估计了在与药物滥用服务机构有接触的有注射吸毒史人群中筛查丙型肝炎感染的成本效益。

方法

建立了一个基于电子表格的筛查模型,先采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),随后进行聚合酶链反应检测,并采用α干扰素和利巴韦林联合治疗。通过文献综述、专家意见以及对英国当前筛查实践的调查确定参数。进行了一系列单向敏感性分析,以探讨成本效益结果的不确定性。

结果

在相关人群中筛查丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)可能会带来效益,每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本约为28,000英镑。在广泛的单向敏感性分析中,这一估计相当稳定,但似乎对接受活检或治疗的HCV阳性人群比例以及与成功药物治疗相关的效用增益敏感。其他重要的不确定领域包括其他原因导致的死亡率对该人群筛查成本效益的影响,以及在没有筛查计划的情况下症状导致就诊的时间。

结论

在这一人群中筛查HCV具有一定的成本效益,不过鉴于该领域目前存在的不确定性,在接受这一估计时仍需谨慎,还需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Screening for Hepatitis C in injecting drug users: a cost utility analysis.对注射吸毒者进行丙型肝炎筛查:成本效用分析。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Mar;26(1):61-71. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh109.
2
What is the cost utility of screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in intravenous drug users?对静脉注射吸毒者进行丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)筛查的成本效益如何?
J Med Screen. 1999;6(3):124-31. doi: 10.1136/jms.6.3.124.
3
The cost-effectiveness of testing for hepatitis C in former injecting drug users.对曾经注射吸毒者进行丙型肝炎检测的成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(32):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-93. doi: 10.3310/hta10320.
4
Cost-effectiveness model for hepatitis C screening and treatment: Implications for Egypt and other countries with high prevalence.丙型肝炎筛查与治疗的成本效益模型:对埃及及其他高流行率国家的启示
Glob Public Health. 2015;10(3):296-317. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.984742. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
5
Screening for hepatitis C in genito-urinary medicine clinics: a cost utility analysis.泌尿生殖医学诊所丙型肝炎筛查:成本效用分析。
J Hepatol. 2003 Nov;39(5):814-25. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(03)00392-1.
6
Cost effectiveness of hepatitis C-related interventions targeting substance users and other high-risk groups: a systematic review.针对药物使用者和其他高危人群的丙型肝炎相关干预措施的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Nov 1;30(11):1015-34. doi: 10.2165/11597660-000000000-00000.
7
Case finding for hepatitis C in primary care: a cost utility analysis.基层医疗中丙型肝炎的病例发现:一项成本效用分析。
Fam Pract. 2006 Aug;23(4):393-406. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml032. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
8
What is the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment for injecting drug users on methadone maintenance in New Zealand?在新西兰,对接受美沙酮维持治疗的注射吸毒者进行丙型肝炎治疗的成本效益如何?
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2004 Sep;23(3):261-72. doi: 10.1080/09595230412331289419.
9
Increasing hepatitis C virus screening in people who inject drugs in Switzerland using rapid antibody saliva and dried blood spot testing: A cost-effectiveness analysis.在瑞士,使用快速抗体唾液和干血斑检测法提高注射毒品人群丙型肝炎病毒筛查率的成本效益分析。
J Viral Hepat. 2019 Feb;26(2):236-245. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13023. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
10
HCV screening to enable early treatment of hepatitis C: a mathematical model to analyse costs and outcomes in two populations.丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)筛查以实现丙型肝炎的早期治疗:一种分析两个人群成本和结果的数学模型
Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14(17):1655-60. doi: 10.2174/138161208784746833.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of Universal and Targeted Hepatitis C Virus Screening in the United States.美国普遍和靶向性丙型肝炎病毒筛查的成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2015756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15756.
2
Elimination of hepatitis C virus in Germany: modelling the cost-effectiveness of HCV screening strategies.德国丙型肝炎病毒的消除:丙型肝炎病毒筛查策略的成本效益建模
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 2;19(1):1019. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4524-z.
3
Is hepatitis C virus elimination possible among people living with HIV and what will it take to achieve it?
在 HIV 感染者中实现丙型肝炎病毒消除是否可行?以及需要采取哪些措施来实现这一目标?
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Apr;21 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):e25062. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25062.
4
Economic evaluation of HCV testing approaches in low and middle income countries.低收入和中等收入国家丙型肝炎病毒检测方法的经济评估
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 1;17(Suppl 1):697. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2779-9.
5
Cost-effectiveness of screening for hepatitis C virus: a systematic review of economic evaluations.丙型肝炎病毒筛查的成本效益:经济评估的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 6;6(9):e011821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011821.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Testing Strategies that Use Antibody Levels to Detect Chronic Hepatitis C in Blood Donors.使用抗体水平检测献血者慢性丙型肝炎的不同检测策略的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2016 May 9;11(5):e0154625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154625. eCollection 2016.
7
Prioritization of HCV treatment in the direct-acting antiviral era: An economic evaluation.直接抗病毒药物时代丙型肝炎病毒治疗的优先级:一项经济学评估。
J Hepatol. 2016 Jul;65(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
8
Is increased hepatitis C virus case-finding combined with current or 8-week to 12-week direct-acting antiviral therapy cost-effective in UK prisons? A prevention benefit analysis.在英国监狱中,增加丙型肝炎病毒病例发现率并结合当前或8至12周的直接抗病毒治疗是否具有成本效益?一项预防效益分析。
Hepatology. 2016 Jun;63(6):1796-808. doi: 10.1002/hep.28497. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of HBV and HCV Screening Strategies--A Systematic Review of Existing Modelling Techniques.乙肝和丙肝筛查策略的成本效益——对现有建模技术的系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 21;10(12):e0145022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145022. eCollection 2015.
10
Cost-effectiveness of HCV case-finding for people who inject drugs via dried blood spot testing in specialist addiction services and prisons.在专科戒毒服务机构和监狱中,通过干血斑检测对吸毒者进行 HCV 病例发现的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 13;3(8):e003153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003153.