Wong Mitchell D, Cunningham William E, Shapiro Martin F, Andersen Ronald M, Cleary Paul D, Duan Naihua, Liu Hong Hu, Wilson Ira B, Landon Bruce E, Wenger Neil S
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1736, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Apr;19(4):366-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30429.x.
Current HIV treatment guidelines recommend delaying antiretroviral therapy for nonadherent patients, which some fear may disproportionately affect certain populations and contribute to disparities in care.
To examine the relationship of physician's attitude toward prescribing protease inhibitors (PIs) to nonadherent patients with disparities in PI use and with health outcomes.
Prospective cohort study.
A national probability sample of HIV-infected adults in the United States and their health care providers was surveyed between January 1996 and January 1998. We analyzed data on 1717 patients eligible for PI treatment and the 367 providers who cared for them.
Providers' attitude toward prescribing PIs to nonadherent patients, time until patients' first receipt of PIs, mortality, and physical health status.
Eighty-nine percent of providers agreed that patient adherence is important in their decision to prescribe PIs (Selective) while 11% disagreed (Nonselective). Patients who had a Selective provider received PIs later than those with a Nonselective provider (P =.05). Adjusting for patient demographics and health characteristics and provider demographics, HIV knowledge, and experience, Latinos, women, and poor patients received PIs later if their provider had a Selective attitude but as soon as others if their provider had a Nonselective attitude. African-American patients received PIs later than whites, irrespective of their providers' prescribing attitude. Patients with Selective providers had similar odds of mortality than those with Nonselective providers (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.6 to 2.0), but had slightly worse adjusted physical health status at follow-up (49.1 vs 50.4, respectively; P =.04), after controlling for baseline physical health status and other patient and provider covariates.
Most providers consider patient adherence an important factor in their decision to prescribe PIs. This attitude appears to account for the relatively later use of PI treatment among Latinos, women, and the poor. Given the rising HIV infection rates among minorities, women, and the poor, further investigation of this treatment strategy and its impact on HIV resistance and outcomes is warranted.
当前的艾滋病病毒治疗指南建议,对于不坚持治疗的患者,应推迟抗逆转录病毒治疗,一些人担心这可能会对某些人群产生不成比例的影响,并导致医疗服务的差异。
研究医生对不坚持治疗的患者开具蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)的态度与PI使用差异及健康结果之间的关系。
前瞻性队列研究。
1996年1月至1998年1月期间,对美国全国范围内感染艾滋病病毒的成年人及其医疗服务提供者进行了概率抽样调查。我们分析了1717例符合PI治疗条件的患者以及为他们提供治疗的367名医疗服务提供者的数据。
医疗服务提供者对不坚持治疗的患者开具PI的态度、患者首次接受PI治疗的时间、死亡率和身体健康状况。
89%的医疗服务提供者认为患者的依从性对他们开具PI的决定很重要(选择性),而11%的人不同意(非选择性)。有选择性态度医疗服务提供者的患者比有非选择性态度医疗服务提供者的患者接受PI治疗的时间更晚(P = 0.05)。在调整患者人口统计学和健康特征以及医疗服务提供者的人口统计学、艾滋病病毒知识和经验后,拉丁裔、女性和贫困患者如果其医疗服务提供者持选择性态度,接受PI治疗的时间会更晚,但如果其医疗服务提供者持非选择性态度,则与其他人同时接受治疗。非裔美国患者接受PI治疗的时间比白人晚,无论其医疗服务提供者的开具态度如何。有选择性态度医疗服务提供者的患者的死亡几率与有非选择性态度医疗服务提供者的患者相似(优势比,1.1;95%置信区间,0.6至2.0),但在控制基线身体健康状况和其他患者及医疗服务提供者协变量后,随访时调整后的身体健康状况略差(分别为49.1和50.4;P = 0.04)。
大多数医疗服务提供者认为患者的依从性是他们开具PI决定中的一个重要因素。这种态度似乎可以解释拉丁裔、女性和贫困人群中PI治疗使用相对较晚的情况。鉴于少数族裔、女性和贫困人口中艾滋病病毒感染率不断上升,有必要进一步研究这种治疗策略及其对艾滋病病毒耐药性和治疗结果的影响。