Chadwick Ruth
Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, Lancashire LA1 4SH, UK.
Proc Nutr Soc. 2004 Feb;63(1):161-6. doi: 10.1079/PNS2003329.
Issues arising in connection with genes and nutrition policy include both nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics. Nutrigenomics considers the relationship between specifc nutrients or diet and gene expression and, it is envisaged, will facilitate prevention of diet-related common diseases. Nutrigenetics is concerned with the effects of individual genetic variation (single nucleotide polymorphisms) on response to diet, and in the longer term may lead to personalised dietary recommendations. It is important also to consider the surrounding context of other issues such as novel and functional foods in so far as they are related to genetic modification. Ethical issues fall into a number of categories: (1) why nutrigenomics? Will it have important public health benefits? (2) questions about research, e.g. concerning the acquisition of information about individual genetic variation; (3) questions about who has access to this information, and its possible misuse; (4) the applications of this information in terms of public health policy, and the negotiation of the potential tension between the interests of the individual in relation to, for example, prevention of conditions such as obesity and allergy; (5) the appropriate ethical approach to the issues, e.g. the moral difference, if any, between therapy and enhancement in relation to individualised diets; whether the 'technological fix' is always appropriate, especially in the wider context of the purported lack of public confidence in science, which has special resonance in the sphere of nutrition.
与基因和营养政策相关的问题包括营养基因组学和营养遗传学。营养基因组学研究特定营养素或饮食与基因表达之间的关系,据设想,它将有助于预防与饮食相关的常见疾病。营养遗传学关注个体基因变异(单核苷酸多态性)对饮食反应的影响,从长远来看可能会产生个性化的饮食建议。同样重要的是要考虑其他问题的背景情况,比如新型和功能性食品,只要它们与基因改造有关。伦理问题可分为若干类别:(1)为什么是营养基因组学?它会带来重要的公共卫生益处吗?(2)关于研究的问题,例如有关获取个体基因变异信息的问题;(3)关于谁能获取这些信息以及其可能被滥用的问题;(4)这些信息在公共卫生政策方面的应用,以及如何协调个体利益之间潜在的紧张关系,比如在预防肥胖和过敏等疾病方面;(5)针对这些问题的适当伦理方法,例如在个性化饮食方面治疗与增强之间(如果存在的话)的道德差异;“技术解决方案”是否总是合适,特别是在所谓公众对科学缺乏信心的更广泛背景下,这在营养领域有特殊的反响。