• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为儿童福利系统中的大龄儿童提供更好的机会。

Providing better opportunities for older children in the child welfare system.

作者信息

Massinga Ruth, Pecora Peter J

机构信息

Casey Family Programs, School of Social Work, University of Washington, USA.

出版信息

Future Child. 2004 Winter;14(1):150-73.

PMID:15072023
Abstract

A growing number of children over age 10 reside in and emancipate from foster care every year. Older children face many of the same challenges as younger children, but they also have unique developmental needs. This article discusses older children in the child welfare system and finds: Approximately 47% of children in foster care are over age 11, and in 2001, 20% of children leaving foster care were over age 16. Older children need permanency, stability, and a "forever family." Maintaining connections with siblings and other kin can be a crucial resource for older children as they transition to independence. Former foster children are at higher risk for a number of negative outcomes, such as substance abuse, homelessness, and low educational attainment, but the research on older youth is limited and often does not consider the strengths these youth exhibit. Much can be done to better serve older children while they are in care and to provide them with better opportunities as they transition out of the system. Programs that draw on community resources, promote a system of care, link children to mentors, and teach them life skills hold promise for improving the lives of these children.

摘要

每年有越来越多10岁以上的儿童生活在寄养家庭并脱离寄养状态。大龄儿童面临着许多与年幼儿童相同的挑战,但他们也有独特的发展需求。本文探讨了儿童福利系统中的大龄儿童,发现:寄养儿童中约47%的年龄超过11岁,在2001年,脱离寄养状态的儿童中有20%的年龄超过16岁。大龄儿童需要永久性、稳定性和一个“永远的家”。在大龄儿童向独立过渡时,与兄弟姐妹及其他亲属保持联系可能是一项至关重要的资源。曾在寄养家庭生活过的儿童出现一系列负面后果的风险更高,如药物滥用、无家可归和低教育程度,但针对大龄青少年的研究有限,且往往没有考虑到这些青少年所展现出的优势。在大龄儿童接受照料期间,可以采取很多措施来更好地为他们服务,并在他们脱离该系统时为他们提供更好的机会。利用社区资源、推广照料体系、将儿童与导师联系起来并教给他们生活技能的项目有望改善这些儿童的生活。

相似文献

1
Providing better opportunities for older children in the child welfare system.为儿童福利系统中的大龄儿童提供更好的机会。
Future Child. 2004 Winter;14(1):150-73.
2
Permanency and the Foster Care System.永久性与寄养制度。
Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2015 Oct;45(10):306-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
3
Mentoring and social skills training: ensuring better outcomes for youth in foster care.指导与社交技能培训:确保寄养青年获得更好的结果。
Child Welfare. 2011;90(1):59-74.
4
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
5
Can't do it alone: housing collaborations to improve foster youth outcomes.无法独自完成:住房合作改善寄养青年的状况。
Child Welfare. 2004 Sep-Oct;83(5):469-92.
6
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Family Finding: A Relative Search and Engagement Intervention for Youth Lingering in Foster Care.一项家庭寻找的随机对照试验:一项针对寄养中徘徊青少年的亲属搜索与参与干预措施
Eval Rev. 2017 Dec;41(6):542-567. doi: 10.1177/0193841X17689971. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
7
Safety and stability for foster children: a developmental perspective.寄养儿童的安全与稳定性:发展视角
Future Child. 2004 Winter;14(1):30-47.
8
When children cannot remain home: foster family care and kinship care.当孩子无法居家时:寄养家庭照料和亲属照料。
Future Child. 1998 Spring;8(1):72-87.
9
The evolution of kinship care policy and practice.亲属抚养政策与实践的演变
Future Child. 2004 Winter;14(1):130-49.
10
Safety and stability for foster children: the policy context.寄养儿童的安全与稳定:政策背景。
Future Child. 2004 Winter;14(1):48-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Parenting intervention outcomes for kinship caregivers and child: A systematic review.亲属照顾者和儿童的养育干预结果:系统评价。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Aug;106:104524. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104524. Epub 2020 May 22.
2
Perspectives of Youth in Foster Care on Essential Ingredients for Promoting Self-determination and Successful Transition to Adult Life: My Life Model.寄养青年对促进自我决定和成功过渡到成年生活的关键要素的看法:我的生活模式。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018 Feb;86:277-286. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
3
Better futures: a randomized field test of a model for supporting young people in foster care with mental health challenges to participate in higher education.
更美好的未来:一项随机实地试验,该试验采用一种模式来支持有心理健康问题的寄养青年参与高等教育。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr;42(2):150-71. doi: 10.1007/s11414-014-9451-6.
4
Institutional predictors of developmental outcomes among racially diverse foster care alumni.不同种族寄养毕业生发展结果的机构预测因素。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2012 Oct;82(4):573-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01181.x.
5
Prevalence and Predictors of Service Utilization Among Racially and Ethnically Diverse Adolescents in Foster Care Diagnosed With Mental Health and Substance Abuse Disorders.寄养环境中被诊断患有心理健康和药物滥用障碍的不同种族和族裔青少年的服务利用情况及预测因素
J Public Child Welf. 2011;5(5):521-545. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2011.617277. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
6
Predicting family reunification, adoption, and subsidized guardianship among adolescents in foster care.预测寄养青少年的家庭团聚、收养和补贴监护情况。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2010 Jul;80(3):422-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01045.x.
7
Prevalence and Timing of Diagnosable Mental Health, Alcohol, and Substance Use Problems among Older Adolescents in the Child Welfare System.儿童福利系统中青少年晚期可诊断心理健康、酒精及物质使用问题的患病率与诊断时机
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010 Apr 1;32(4):626-634. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.12.010.
8
Approaching the Transition to Adulthood: Distinctive Profiles of Adolescents Aging out of the Child Welfare System.迈向成年期的过渡:脱离儿童福利系统的青少年的独特特征。
Soc Serv Rev. 2007 Sep 1;81(3):453-484. doi: 10.1086/519536.
9
Non-kin natural mentors in the lives of older youths in foster care.寄养大龄青少年生活中的非亲属自然导师。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct;35(4):454-68. doi: 10.1007/s11414-006-9040-4. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
10
Youths living away from families in the US mental health system: opportunities for targeted intervention.在美国心理健康系统中与家人分离生活的青少年:有针对性干预的机会。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2005 Jul-Sep;32(3):264-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02291827.