Motta Pablo, Mossad Emad, Toscana Diego, Lozano Sara, Insler Steve
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Apr;18(2):148-51. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.01.018.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the ALLON 2001 microprocessor-based thermoregulation system in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass compared with the routine thermal care.
Prospective randomized clinical study.
Single tertiary academic medical center.
Infants (0-1 year) who underwent congenital heart surgery requiring hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 18). Patients with open wounds and/or patients treated with an investigational drug or device within 30 days of surgery were excluded.
Randomized use of thermoregulation system (warming garment, n = 9) or routine thermal care (control, n = 9) after separating from cardiopulmonary bypass until the arrival to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
There were no statistically significant differences in the demographic data, cardiopulmonary bypass time, operating room time, incidence of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, and cooling temperature between the groups. The nasopharyngeal temperature was significantly higher in the warming garment group after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass. Nasopharyngeal temperature at 20 minutes was 36.5 degrees C versus 35.01 degrees C (p = 0.0047), at 40 minutes was 36.98 degrees C versus 35.30 degrees C (p = 0.034), and at admission to the PICU was 36.09 degrees C versus 35.31 degrees C (p = not significant). There was no difference in the core-to-peripheral temperature gradient (nasopharyngeal-to-skin temperature) between the 2 study groups at any time point. No adverse events related to the use of the warming garment thermoregulation system were observed.
The investigated thermoregulation system was effective in preventing the after-drop of temperature that occurs after cardiopulmonary bypass in small infants compared with routine warming methods.
评估ALLON 2001微处理器控温系统在接受需要低温体外循环心脏手术的儿科患者中的有效性和安全性,并与常规体温护理进行比较。
前瞻性随机临床研究。
单一的三级学术医疗中心。
接受需要低温体外循环的先天性心脏手术的婴儿(0至1岁)(n = 18)。排除有开放性伤口的患者和/或在手术30天内接受研究药物或器械治疗的患者。
在体外循环结束后至到达儿科重症监护病房(PICU)期间,随机使用控温系统(保暖衣,n = 9)或常规体温护理(对照组,n = 9)。
两组在人口统计学数据、体外循环时间、手术室时间、深度低温循环停搏发生率和降温温度方面无统计学显著差异。体外循环结束后,保暖衣组的鼻咽温度显著更高。20分钟时鼻咽温度为36.5℃,而对照组为35.01℃(p = 0.0047);40分钟时为36.98℃,而对照组为35.30℃(p = 0.034);进入PICU时为36.09℃,而对照组为35.31℃(p = 无显著差异)。在任何时间点,两个研究组的核心到外周温度梯度(鼻咽到皮肤温度)均无差异。未观察到与使用保暖衣控温系统相关的不良事件。
与常规保暖方法相比,所研究的控温系统在预防小婴儿体外循环后体温下降方面有效。