Carpenter Brian, Dave Jennifer
Department of Psychology, Campus Box 1125, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Gerontologist. 2004 Apr;44(2):149-58. doi: 10.1093/geront/44.2.149.
The ethical and practical issues in disclosing a dementia diagnosis remain subjects of some debate. In this review of the literature we document previous opinion and practice in the area of diagnostic disclosure.
We identified sources for this review with a MEDLINE and PsycINFO database search, followed by collection of additional articles from reference lists.
Across sources we were able to identify a broad list of arguments both for and against diagnostic disclosure. We briefly discuss some of the ethical principles that undergird those reasons.
Practice guidelines and professional opinion regarding disclosure appear to depart from the actual experience reported by clinicians, patients, and family members. At a more detailed level, process issues in disclosure, such as who is told, how and what they are told, and the impact of disclosure, are poorly understood. Sensitivity to individual differences may promote an optimal approach to disclosure. Research in this area is sparse and often contradictory, and throughout the review we propose research questions that, when answered, could clarify issues in disclosure that are essential to sound dementia care.
披露痴呆症诊断中的伦理和实际问题仍是一些争议的主题。在本次文献综述中,我们记录了以往在诊断披露领域的观点和实践。
我们通过检索MEDLINE和PsycINFO数据库确定了本次综述的资料来源,随后从参考文献列表中收集了其他文章。
通过各种资料来源,我们能够确定一系列支持和反对诊断披露的广泛论据。我们简要讨论了支撑这些理由的一些伦理原则。
关于披露的实践指南和专业意见似乎与临床医生、患者和家庭成员报告的实际经验有所不同。在更详细的层面上,披露过程中的问题,如告知对象、告知方式和内容以及披露的影响,人们了解得并不充分。对个体差异的敏感性可能有助于促进最佳的披露方式。该领域的研究较少且往往相互矛盾,在整个综述过程中,我们提出了一些研究问题,若能得到解答,可能会澄清痴呆症合理护理中至关重要的披露问题。