Suppr超能文献

女性血红蛋白A1c水平与未来心血管事件

Hemoglobin A1c level and future cardiovascular events among women.

作者信息

Blake Gavin J, Pradhan Aruna D, Manson JoAnn E, Williams G Rhys, Buring Julie, Ridker Paul M, Glynn Robert J

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, the Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, and the Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2004 Apr 12;164(7):757-61. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.7.757.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Available data suggest that hemoglobin A(1c) (A(1c)), also known as glycosylated hemoglobin, levels may be related to cardiovascular risk in the general population without diabetes mellitus. We sought to test this hypothesis prospectively in a cohort of women without overt cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study of the Women's Health Study cohort. We identified 464 case patients with incident myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary revascularization and 928 unmatched control subjects who remained free of cardiovascular events at case diagnosis. The mean follow-up was 7 years.

RESULTS

Of the overall study population, 136 had a history of diabetes mellitus or an overtly elevated baseline A(1c) level (>6.4%) and were excluded from the primary analyses. Among women without diabetes mellitus or an elevated baseline A(1c) level, mean +/- SD baseline levels of A(1c) were significantly higher among future cases than controls (5.47% +/- 0.27% vs 5.37% +/- 0.22%; P<.001). The crude relative risks (RRs) of incident cardiovascular events for increasing quartiles of A(1c) were 1.00, 0.98, 1.33, and 2.25 (95% confidence interval [CI] for the highest vs the lowest quartile, 1.59-3.18). The A(1c) levels correlated with several other traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and in fully adjusted models, the predictive effect of A(1c) was attenuated and not significant (RR for the highest vs the lowest quartile, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65-1.54). In contrast, in the population including women with diabetes mellitus at enrollment, diabetes mellitus (RR, 4.97; 95% CI, 2.81-8.77) remained a strong independent determinant of cardiovascular risk in fully adjusted analyses, while A(1c) levels did not (RR for the highest vs the lowest quartile, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.73-1.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The A(1c) level is associated with future cardiovascular risk among women without diabetes mellitus, but this relationship is largely attributable to a strong correlation with other cardiovascular risk factors. In contrast, diabetes mellitus is a strong independent determinant of cardiovascular risk, even after adjustment for A(1c) levels.

摘要

背景

现有数据表明,糖化血红蛋白A1c(A1c)水平可能与普通非糖尿病人群的心血管风险相关。我们试图在一组无明显心血管疾病的女性队列中对这一假设进行前瞻性验证。

方法

我们对女性健康研究队列进行了一项巢式病例对照研究。我们确定了464例发生心肌梗死、中风或冠状动脉血运重建的病例患者以及928例在病例诊断时未发生心血管事件的非匹配对照受试者。平均随访时间为7年。

结果

在整个研究人群中,136例有糖尿病病史或基线A1c水平明显升高(>6.4%),被排除在主要分析之外。在无糖尿病或基线A1c水平未升高的女性中,未来病例的A1c平均±标准差基线水平显著高于对照组(5.47%±0.27%对5.37%±0.22%;P<0.001)。A1c四分位数增加时,心血管事件发生的粗相对风险(RR)分别为1.00、0.98、1.33和2.25(最高四分位数与最低四分位数的95%置信区间[CI]为1.59 - 3.18)。A1c水平与其他几种传统心血管危险因素相关,在完全调整模型中,A1c的预测作用减弱且无统计学意义(最高四分位数与最低四分位数的RR为1.00;95%CI为0.65 - 1.54)。相比之下,在入组时包括糖尿病女性的人群中,在完全调整分析中,糖尿病(RR为4.97;95%CI为2.81 - 8.77)仍然是心血管风险的一个强有力的独立决定因素,而A1c水平则不然(最高四分位数与最低四分位数的RR为1.11;95%CI为0.73 - 1.71)。

结论

A1c水平与无糖尿病女性未来的心血管风险相关,但这种关系很大程度上归因于与其他心血管危险因素的强相关性。相比之下,即使在调整了A1c水平后,糖尿病仍是心血管风险的一个强有力的独立决定因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验