University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Box C-280, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Jan;20(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 Apr 11.
Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) has been associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), but the findings are inconsistent. We tested the hypothesis that HbA(1c) may be associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular mortality in older adults.
We evaluated the association between HbA(1c) with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in 810 participants without a history of diabetes in a sub-study of the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a community cohort study of individuals > or =65 years of age. Glycosylated hemoglobin was measured at baseline and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was assessed during the follow-up period. The relation between baseline HbA(1c) and death was evaluated with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. After a median follow-up of 14.2 years, 416 deaths were observed. The crude incidence rates of all-cause mortality across HbA(1c) groups were: 4.4% per year, 4.3% per year and 4.6% per year for tertile 1 (< or =5.6%), tertile 2 (5.61-6.20%) and tertile 3 (> or =6.21%), respectively. In unadjusted and fully adjusted analyses, baseline HbA(1c) was not associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio: 1.16 [95% confidence interval 0.91-1.47] and hazard ratio: 1.31 [95% confidence interval 0.90-1.93], respectively for the highest HbA(1c) tertile compared with the lowest).
These results suggest that HbA(1c) does not significantly predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in non-diabetic community-dwelling older adults.
糖化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))与心血管疾病(CVD)的发生有关,但研究结果不一致。我们检验了以下假说,即 HbA(1c) 可能与老年人死亡和心血管死亡率的增加相关。
我们在心血管健康研究(CHS)的一个子研究中评估了 810 名无糖尿病病史的参与者中 HbA(1c) 与全因和心血管死亡率之间的关系,该研究是一项针对 > 或 = 65 岁人群的社区队列研究。在基线时测量了糖化血红蛋白,在随访期间评估了全因和心血管死亡率。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估了基线 HbA(1c) 与死亡之间的关系。在中位数为 14.2 年的随访后,观察到 416 例死亡。各 HbA(1c) 组的全因死亡率的粗发生率分别为:第 1 三分位数(< 或 = 5.6%)为 4.4%/年,第 2 三分位数(5.61-6.20%)为 4.3%/年,第 3 三分位数(> 或 = 6.21%)为 4.6%/年。在未调整和完全调整的分析中,基线 HbA(1c) 与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率无关(最高 HbA(1c) 三分位组与最低三分位组相比,风险比分别为 1.16[95%置信区间 0.91-1.47]和 1.31[95%置信区间 0.90-1.93])。
这些结果表明,HbA(1c) 不能显著预测非糖尿病的社区居住老年人的全因和心血管死亡率。