Who owns biodiversity, and how should the owners be compensated?
作者信息
Gepts Paul
机构信息
Department of Agronomy and Range Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616-8515, USA.
出版信息
Plant Physiol. 2004 Apr;134(4):1295-307. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.038885.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Who owns biodiversity, and how should the owners be compensated?
Plant Physiol. 2004 Apr;134(4):1295-307. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.038885.
2
Plant genetic resources and the law: past, present, and future.
Plant Physiol. 2004 May;135(1):10-5. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.042572.
3
Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries.
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):171-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019612.
4
Patent necessity: intellectual property dilemmas in the biotech domain and treatment equity for developing countries.
Houst J Int Law. 2002;24(2):227-78.
5
Agriculture and the developing world.
Science. 2003 Oct 17;302(5644):357. doi: 10.1126/science.302.5644.357.
6
Convention on Biological Diversity. U.N. biodiversity summit yields welcome and unexpected progress.
Science. 2010 Nov 5;330(6005):742-3. doi: 10.1126/science.330.6005.742.
7
Biodiversity, biopiracy and benefits: what allegations of biopiracy tell us about intellectual property.
Dev World Bioeth. 2006 Dec;6(3):158-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00168.x.
8
Intellectual property. Plants and intellectual property: an international appraisal.
Science. 2004 Nov 19;306(5700):1295-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1106760.
9
Agricultural IP and the public sector.
Science. 2003 Oct 31;302(5646):781-3; author reply 781-3.
10
Intellectual property, commercial needs and humanitarian benefits: must there be a conflict?
N Biotechnol. 2010 Nov 30;27(5):573-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 May 22.
引用本文的文献
1
The dilemma of food genetics and improvement.
Open Life Sci. 2025 Aug 2;20(1):20251150. doi: 10.1515/biol-2025-1150. eCollection 2025.
2
Methods of crop improvement and applications towards fortifying food security.
Front Genome Ed. 2023 Jul 7;5:1171969. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2023.1171969. eCollection 2023.
3
Legacy genetics of in the peanut crop shows the profound benefits of international seed exchange.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 21;118(38). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104899118.
4
Ethical Evaluation Capacity of Turkish Food and Agricultural Engineers and Veterinary Physicians with Regard to Agriculture and Food System.
J Agric Environ Ethics. 2021;34(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s10806-021-09847-2. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
5
Fragmentation of Pooled PCR Products for Highly Multiplexed TILLING.
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Aug 8;9(8):2657-2666. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400301.
6
Morphological and molecular characterization of Brazilian populations of Diatraea saccharalis (Fabricius, 1794) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and the evolutionary relationship among species of Diatraea Guilding.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 16;12(11):e0186266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186266. eCollection 2017.
7
Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Busseola segeta Bowden (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae): A Case Study of Host Use Diversification in Guineo-Congolian Rainforest Relic Area, Kenya.
Insects. 2012 Nov 6;3(4):1156-70. doi: 10.3390/insects3041156.
8
Exploring germplasm diversity to understand the domestication process in Cicer spp. using SNP and DArT markers.
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 10;9(7):e102016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102016. eCollection 2014.
9
Genetic diversity and demographic history of Cajanus spp. illustrated from genome-wide SNPs.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 12;9(2):e88568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088568. eCollection 2014.
10
How should the benefits of bioprospecting be shared?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2010 Jan-Feb;40(1):24-33. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0227.
本文引用的文献
1
Possible effects of (trans)gene flow from crops on the genetic diversity from landraces and wild relatives.
Environ Biosafety Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;2(2):89-103. doi: 10.1051/ebr:2003009.
2
Intellectual property rights. Public sector collaboration for agricultural IP management.
Science. 2003 Jul 11;301(5630):174-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1085553.
3
Patent law. Natural substances and patentable inventions.
Science. 2003 May 30;300(5624):1375-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1083367.
4
Ethnobotanical knowledge shared widely among Tsimane' Amerindians, Bolivia.
Science. 2003 Mar 14;299(5613):1707. doi: 10.1126/science.1080274.
5
Commodification of the sacred through intellectual property rights.
J Ethnopharmacol. 2002 Nov;83(1-2):3-12. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00189-7.
6
Genes and patent policy: rethinking intellectual property rights.
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Oct;3(10):803-8. doi: 10.1038/nrg909.
7
Patenting genes and genetic research: good or bad for innovation?
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2002;3:415-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.3.032102.170635. Epub 2002 Apr 15.
8
Plant biotechnology in China.
Science. 2002 Jan 25;295(5555):674-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1067226.
9
The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery.
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Mar;109 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):69-75. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s169.
10
Golden rice and beyond.
Plant Physiol. 2001 Mar;125(3):1157-61. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.3.1157.
Zotero 插件