Gottrup Finn
University Center of Wound Healing, Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Wound Repair Regen. 2004 Mar-Apr;12(2):129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012204.x.
Considerable developments have occurred in wound healing and care over the last few decades. Innovative technologies such as use of growth factors, bioengineered skin, topical negative pressure, heat, oxygen, and others have entered the clinic. These techniques have been advantageous, but even the most advanced and sophisticated product requires proper wound care and wound bed preparation in order to function optimally. It has been shown that the organization of a wound team, not the change in products, increases the healing of problem wounds (MTV Report, Denmark, 2003). Efficacy studies are generally performed in a few centers with investigators already experienced in the field. This probably leads to an optimal efficacy of the product. Problems arise when the product is marketed and is used by clinicians not specially educated in wound care. If no treatment plan and education is performed, product efficacy and cost-effectiveness decrease dramatically. This is clearly a major problem for patients, but also for communities and, in the end, for companies' sale of the product. Structuring of treatment and education is for these reasons the largest present challenge in the area of wound healing. The optimal way to treat nonhealing wounds is based on a multidisciplinary concept that has been implemented in a national health care system as a recognized expert function. It should consist of a specific treatment plan including modern wound care products and well-educated personnel. This structure is similar to other areas of the medical profession, but has to a lesser degree been established in the treatment of problem wounds. A growing understanding of the importance of this area is, however, shown by the increasing number of working groups focusing on organization and education in wound care. Presently the European Wound Management Association, the World Union of Wound Healing Societies, and The Danish Wound Healing Society have created such types of working groups.
在过去几十年里,伤口愈合与护理领域取得了重大进展。诸如生长因子的应用、生物工程皮肤、局部负压、热疗、氧疗等创新技术已进入临床。这些技术具有优势,但即使是最先进、最复杂的产品,也需要适当的伤口护理和伤口床准备,才能发挥最佳功能。研究表明,组建伤口护理团队而非更换产品,能提高难愈合伤口的愈合率(丹麦MTV报告,2003年)。疗效研究通常在少数几个中心进行,研究人员在该领域已有丰富经验。这可能使产品达到最佳疗效。然而,当产品上市并被未接受过伤口护理专业培训的临床医生使用时,问题就出现了。如果没有制定治疗计划和开展相关培训,产品的疗效和成本效益将大幅下降。这显然不仅对患者是个大问题,对社区乃至最终对公司产品的销售都是如此。基于上述原因,构建治疗和培训体系是伤口愈合领域当前面临的最大挑战。治疗难愈合伤口的最佳方法基于多学科理念,该理念已在国家医疗保健系统中作为一项公认的专家职能得以实施。它应包括一个具体的治疗计划,其中涵盖现代伤口护理产品和训练有素的人员。这种架构与医疗行业的其他领域类似,但在难愈合伤口的治疗中尚未得到充分确立。不过,越来越多专注于伤口护理组织和培训的工作组表明,人们对该领域重要性的认识在不断提高。目前,欧洲伤口管理协会、世界伤口愈合学会联盟以及丹麦伤口愈合学会都已成立了此类工作组。