Rothermund Klaus, Wentura Dirk
Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):139-65. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139.
The authors investigated whether effects of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) are influenced by salience asymmetries, independent of associations. Two series of experiments analyzed unique effects of salience by using nonassociated, neutral categories that differed in salience. In a 3rd series, salience asymmetries were manipulated experimentally while holding associations between categories constant. In a 4th series, valent associations of the target categories were manipulated experimentally while holding salience asymmetries constant. Throughout, IAT effects were found to depend on salience asymmetries. Additionally, salience asymmetries between categories were assessed directly with a visual search task to provide an independent criterion of salience asymmetries. Salience asymmetries corresponded to IAT effects and also accounted for common variance in IAT effects and explicit measures of attitudes or the self-concept.
作者们研究了内隐联想测验(IAT)的效应是否受到显著性不对称的影响,而与联想无关。两个系列的实验通过使用显著性不同的非关联中性类别来分析显著性的独特效应。在第三个系列中,在保持类别之间的联想不变的同时,通过实验操纵显著性不对称。在第四个系列中,在保持显著性不对称不变的同时,通过实验操纵目标类别的效价联想。在整个过程中,发现IAT效应取决于显著性不对称。此外,通过视觉搜索任务直接评估类别之间的显著性不对称,以提供显著性不对称的独立标准。显著性不对称与IAT效应相对应,并且还解释了IAT效应以及态度或自我概念的明确测量中的共同方差。