Mierke Jan, Klauer Karl Christoph
Psychological Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):1180-92. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1180.
The Implicit Association Test (IAT; A. G. Greenwald, D. E. McGhee, & J. L. K. Schwartz, 1998) can be used to assess interindividual differences in the strength of associative links between representational structures such as attitude objects and evaluations. Four experiments are reported that explore the extent of method-specific variance in the IAT. The most important findings are that conventionally scored IAT effects contain reliable interindividual differences that are method specific but independent of the measures' content, and that IAT effects can be obtained in the absence of a preexisting association between the response categories. Several techniques to decrease the impact of method-specific variance are evaluated. The best results were obtained with the D measures recently proposed by A. G. Greenwald, B. A. Nosek, and M. R. Banaji (2003).
内隐联想测验(IAT;A.G.格林沃尔德、D.E.麦吉和J.L.K.施瓦茨,1998年)可用于评估诸如态度对象和评价等表征结构之间联想联系强度的个体间差异。本文报告了四项实验,探讨了IAT中特定方法方差的程度。最重要的发现是,传统计分的IAT效应包含可靠的个体间差异,这些差异是特定于方法的,但与测量内容无关,并且在反应类别之间不存在预先存在的关联的情况下也可以获得IAT效应。评估了几种减少特定方法方差影响的技术。采用A.G.格林沃尔德、B.A.诺塞克和M.R.巴纳吉(2003年)最近提出的D指标获得了最佳结果。