Suppr超能文献

时间至关重要:即使控制了选择性歧视的代价,过去的自我也不会被优先考虑。

Time is of the essence: past selves are not prioritized even when selective discrimination costs are controlled for.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Münster, Fliednerstraße 21, 48149, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2023 Apr;87(3):768-786. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01702-x. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

Abstract

The perceptual Self-Prioritization effect (SPE) refers to an advantage in attending to stimuli associated with the self relative to those associated with another individual. In the perceptual matching task, arbitrary pairings between oneself and other persons, and a geometric shape need to be learned. Apart from the SPE, this task also produces high matching performance for a close other. While cognitive representations of past selves are sometimes viewed as resembling that of an intimate other, and while there is some evidence that other types of psychological closeness modulate the SPE, it remains unclear whether such prioritization effects extend to past selves. Previous experiments on this topic required participants to distinguish between different points in time within the same task, raising the possibility that potential past self-prioritization was masked by task difficulty. In our experiment, we addressed this potential confound by presenting N = 118 participants with a simpler version of the matching task. We re-investigated self-prioritization in perceptual matching under conditions of mental time travel to the past. In line with previous evidence, we found clear prioritization of present selves, which was evident in response times, accuracies and the efficiency of practice. Performance was consistently poorest for the past self, indicating not only a lack of privileged processing, but rather a relative de-prioritization. Performance was not improved by either increased proximity of the time period in question, nor by experimenter-induced re-imagining of the self. Our results do not support a perceptual prioritization of past selves.

摘要

自我优先效应(SPE)是指相对于他人,个体对与自我相关的刺激的注意具有优势。在感知匹配任务中,需要学习将自己与他人以及几何图形进行任意配对。除了 SPE,这个任务还会对亲近的他人产生很高的匹配表现。虽然过去自我的认知表现有时被认为类似于亲密他人,但有一些证据表明,其他类型的心理亲近感会调节 SPE,但尚不清楚这种优先处理效应是否会扩展到过去自我。关于这个主题的先前实验要求参与者在同一任务中区分不同的时间点,这增加了潜在的过去自我优先处理可能被任务难度掩盖的可能性。在我们的实验中,我们通过向 N=118 名参与者呈现更简单的匹配任务版本来解决这个潜在的混淆。我们在心理时间旅行到过去的条件下重新研究了感知匹配中的自我优先化。与先前的证据一致,我们发现了当前自我的明显优先处理,这在反应时间、准确性和练习效率上都得到了体现。过去自我的表现始终最差,这不仅表明缺乏特权处理,而且表明相对的优先级降低。无论是增加所讨论时间段的接近度,还是通过实验者诱导的自我重新想象,都不能提高表现。我们的结果不支持过去自我的感知优先化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53e0/10017579/8975deb07337/426_2022_1702_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Time is of the essence: past selves are not prioritized even when selective discrimination costs are controlled for.
Psychol Res. 2023 Apr;87(3):768-786. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01702-x. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
2
Self-prioritization with unisensory and multisensory stimuli in a matching task.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1666-1688. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02498-z. Epub 2022 May 10.
3
Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):2110-2120. doi: 10.1177/1747021819832981. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
4
Modulation of medial prefrontal and inferior parietal cortices when thinking about past, present, and future selves.
Soc Neurosci. 2010;5(2):187-200. doi: 10.1080/17470910903233562. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
5
Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Oct;38(5):1105-17. doi: 10.1037/a0029792. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
6
The oscillatory fingerprints of self-prioritization: Novel markers in spectral EEG for self-relevant processing.
Psychophysiology. 2023 Dec;60(12):e14396. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14396. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
7
Prioritization of personally relevant stimuli in male abstinent heroin users.
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Oct;142:132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.058. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
8
Immediate self-information is prioritized over expanded self-information across temporal, social, spatial, and probability domains.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Sep;74(9):1615-1630. doi: 10.1177/17470218211004208. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
9
Prioritization of self-relevant perspectives in ageing.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jun;70(6):1033-1052. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1127399. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
10
Impact of Cardiac Interoception on the Self-Prioritization Effect.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 12;13:825370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825370. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Levels of Self-representation and Their Sociocognitive Correlates in Late-Diagnosed Autistic Adults.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Jul;52(7):3246-3259. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05251-x. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
2
On stopping yourself: Self-relevance facilitates response inhibition.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1416-1423. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02248-7. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
A preregistered replication and extension of the cocktail party phenomenon: One's name captures attention, unexpected words do not.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Feb;47(2):234-242. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000874. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
5
Social group membership and an incidental ingroup-memory advantage.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):166-178. doi: 10.1177/1747021820948721. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Self-relevance enhances evidence gathering during decision-making.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Sep;209:103122. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103122. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
Parts of me: Identity-relevance moderates self-prioritization.
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Jan;77:102848. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102848. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Can self-referential information improve directed forgetting? Evidence from a multinomial processing tree model.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 28;14(1):e0211280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211280. eCollection 2019.
9
Representing Oneself and Others.
Exp Psychol. 2018 Nov;65(6):323-331. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000433.
10
Shielding and relaxation in multitasking: Prospect of reward counteracts relaxation of task shielding in multitasking.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:112-123. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验