Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Münster, Fliednerstraße 21, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2023 Apr;87(3):768-786. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01702-x. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
The perceptual Self-Prioritization effect (SPE) refers to an advantage in attending to stimuli associated with the self relative to those associated with another individual. In the perceptual matching task, arbitrary pairings between oneself and other persons, and a geometric shape need to be learned. Apart from the SPE, this task also produces high matching performance for a close other. While cognitive representations of past selves are sometimes viewed as resembling that of an intimate other, and while there is some evidence that other types of psychological closeness modulate the SPE, it remains unclear whether such prioritization effects extend to past selves. Previous experiments on this topic required participants to distinguish between different points in time within the same task, raising the possibility that potential past self-prioritization was masked by task difficulty. In our experiment, we addressed this potential confound by presenting N = 118 participants with a simpler version of the matching task. We re-investigated self-prioritization in perceptual matching under conditions of mental time travel to the past. In line with previous evidence, we found clear prioritization of present selves, which was evident in response times, accuracies and the efficiency of practice. Performance was consistently poorest for the past self, indicating not only a lack of privileged processing, but rather a relative de-prioritization. Performance was not improved by either increased proximity of the time period in question, nor by experimenter-induced re-imagining of the self. Our results do not support a perceptual prioritization of past selves.
自我优先效应(SPE)是指相对于他人,个体对与自我相关的刺激的注意具有优势。在感知匹配任务中,需要学习将自己与他人以及几何图形进行任意配对。除了 SPE,这个任务还会对亲近的他人产生很高的匹配表现。虽然过去自我的认知表现有时被认为类似于亲密他人,但有一些证据表明,其他类型的心理亲近感会调节 SPE,但尚不清楚这种优先处理效应是否会扩展到过去自我。关于这个主题的先前实验要求参与者在同一任务中区分不同的时间点,这增加了潜在的过去自我优先处理可能被任务难度掩盖的可能性。在我们的实验中,我们通过向 N=118 名参与者呈现更简单的匹配任务版本来解决这个潜在的混淆。我们在心理时间旅行到过去的条件下重新研究了感知匹配中的自我优先化。与先前的证据一致,我们发现了当前自我的明显优先处理,这在反应时间、准确性和练习效率上都得到了体现。过去自我的表现始终最差,这不仅表明缺乏特权处理,而且表明相对的优先级降低。无论是增加所讨论时间段的接近度,还是通过实验者诱导的自我重新想象,都不能提高表现。我们的结果不支持过去自我的感知优先化。