Stemberger Joseph Paul
Department of Linguistics, University of British Columbia, E270-1866 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1.
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):413-22. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00452-8.
Models of speech production differ on whether phonological neighbourhoods should affect processing, and on whether effects should be facilitatory or inhibitory. Inhibitory effects of large neighbourhoods have been argued to underlie apparent anti-frequency effects, whereby high-frequency default features are more prone to mispronunciation errors than low-frequency nondefault features. Data from the original SLIPs experiments that found apparent anti-frequency effects are analysed for neighbourhood effects. Effects are facilitatory: errors are significantly less likely for words with large numbers of neighbours that share the characteristic that is being primed for error ("friends"). Words in the neighbourhood that do not share the target characteristic ("enemies") have little effect on error rates. Neighbourhood effects do not underlie the apparent anti-frequency effects. Implications for models of speech production are discussed.
言语产生模型在语音邻域是否应影响加工,以及影响是促进性还是抑制性方面存在差异。有人认为,大邻域的抑制性效应是明显的反频率效应的基础,即高频默认特征比低频非默认特征更容易出现发音错误。对最初发现明显反频率效应的SLIPs实验数据进行了邻域效应分析。结果显示为促进性:对于有大量共享正在被引发错误特征的邻词(“朋友”)的单词,错误发生的可能性显著降低。邻域中不共享目标特征的单词(“敌人”)对错误率影响很小。邻域效应并非明显反频率效应的基础。文中讨论了对言语产生模型的启示。