• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语法性消除句法相似名词的歧义。

Grammatical Gender Disambiguates Syntactically Similar Nouns.

作者信息

Rogers Phillip G, Gries Stefan Th

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.

Department of English, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Gießen, Germany.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2022 Apr 7;24(4):520. doi: 10.3390/e24040520.

DOI:10.3390/e24040520
PMID:35455183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9032811/
Abstract

Recent research into grammatical gender from the perspective of information theory has shown how seemingly arbitrary gender systems can ease processing demands by guiding lexical prediction. When the gender of a noun is revealed in a preceding element, the list of possible candidates is reduced to the nouns assigned to that gender. This strategy can be particularly effective if it eliminates words that are likely to compete for activation against the intended word. We propose syntax as the crucial context within which words must be disambiguated, hypothesizing that syntactically similar words should be less likely to share a gender cross-linguistically. We draw on recent work on syntactic information in the lexicon to define the syntactic distribution of a word as a probability vector of its participation in various dependency relations, and we extract such relations for 32 languages from the Universal Dependencies Treebanks. Correlational and mixed-effects regression analyses reveal that syntactically similar nouns are less likely to share a gender, the opposite pattern that is found for semantically and orthographically similar words. We interpret this finding as a design feature of language, and this study adds to a growing body of research attesting to the ways in which functional pressures on learning, memory, production, and perception shape the lexicon in different ways.

摘要

近期从信息论角度对语法性进行的研究表明,看似随意的性系统如何通过引导词汇预测来减轻处理负担。当前一个元素揭示了名词的性时,可能的候选词列表就会缩小到被指定为该性别的名词。如果这种策略能排除那些可能与目标词竞争激活的词,那么它会特别有效。我们提出句法是消除词的歧义的关键语境,并假设在跨语言中,句法相似的词应该不太可能共享性。我们借鉴近期关于词汇中句法信息的研究,将一个词的句法分布定义为其参与各种依存关系的概率向量,并从通用依存关系树库中提取32种语言的此类关系。相关分析和混合效应回归分析表明,句法相似的名词不太可能共享性,这与语义和正字法相似的词的情况相反。我们将这一发现解释为语言的一种设计特征,并且这项研究为越来越多的研究增添了内容,这些研究证明了学习、记忆、生成和感知方面的功能压力以不同方式塑造词汇的方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/bf611ac72cb4/entropy-24-00520-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/7c5a292c8894/entropy-24-00520-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/18092f12c405/entropy-24-00520-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/a66940818314/entropy-24-00520-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/7a1ab1f95243/entropy-24-00520-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/bf611ac72cb4/entropy-24-00520-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/7c5a292c8894/entropy-24-00520-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/18092f12c405/entropy-24-00520-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/a66940818314/entropy-24-00520-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/7a1ab1f95243/entropy-24-00520-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35c/9032811/bf611ac72cb4/entropy-24-00520-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Grammatical Gender Disambiguates Syntactically Similar Nouns.语法性消除句法相似名词的歧义。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Apr 7;24(4):520. doi: 10.3390/e24040520.
2
The representation of lexical-syntactic information: evidence from syntactic and lexical retrieval impairments in aphasia.词汇句法信息的表示:来自失语症中句法和词汇提取障碍的证据。
Cortex. 2012 Oct;48(9):1103-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.024. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
3
Garlic and ginger are not like apples and oranges: Effects of mass/count information on the production of noun phrases in English.大蒜和姜并非截然不同:数量信息对英语名词短语生成的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Mar;71(3):717-748. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1276203. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
There is Something About Grammatical Category in Chinese Visual Word Recognition.汉语视觉词汇识别中的语法类别问题
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Oct;45(5):1067-87. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9392-0.
5
Asymmetric Morphological Priming Among Inflected and Derived Verbs and Nouns in Greek.希腊语中屈折动词和派生动词及名词之间的不对称形态启动效应
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 17;12:658189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658189. eCollection 2021.
6
Grammatical gender in the production of single words: some evidence from Greek.单个词汇生成中的语法性:来自希腊语的一些证据。
Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):236-41. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2520.
7
On the representation of Portuguese gender-inflected words in the mental lexicon.关于葡萄牙语中带性数变化词在心理词典中的表征
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):63-73. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00420-6.
8
Word Order Typology Interacts With Linguistic Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus Study.语序类型学与语言复杂性相互作用:一项跨语言语料库研究。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12822. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12822.
9
Sublexical and lexico-syntactic factors in gender access in Spanish.西班牙语中性别获取方面的次词汇和词汇句法因素。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2014 Feb;43(1):13-25. doi: 10.1007/s10936-012-9236-0.
10
Electrophysiological signatures of event words: Dissociating syntactic and semantic category effects in lexical processing.事件词的电生理特征:区分词汇加工中的句法和语义类别效应
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
How Efficiency Shapes Human Language.效率如何塑造人类语言。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 May;23(5):389-407. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
2
Word Forms Are Structured for Efficient Use.词形结构旨在实现高效使用。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):3116-3134. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12689. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
3
Alternative Solutions to a Language Design Problem: The Role of Adjectives and Gender Marking in Efficient Communication.替代语言设计问题的解决方案:形容词和性别标记在高效交流中的作用。
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;10(1):209-224. doi: 10.1111/tops.12316. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
4
Words cluster phonetically beyond phonotactic regularities.单词在语音上的聚类超出了音位规则。
Cognition. 2017 Jun;163:128-145. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
5
The statistical trade-off between word order and word structure - Large-scale evidence for the principle of least effort.词序与词结构之间的统计权衡——省力原则的大规模证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 10;12(3):e0173614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173614. eCollection 2017.
6
Wordform Similarity Increases With Semantic Similarity: An Analysis of 100 Languages.词形相似度随语义相似度增加:对100种语言的分析
Cogn Sci. 2017 Nov;41(8):2149-2169. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12453. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
7
Balancing Effort and Information Transmission During Language Acquisition: Evidence From Word Order and Case Marking.语言习得过程中努力与信息传递的平衡:来自词序和格标记的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Mar;41(2):416-446. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12346. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
8
Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language.语言的任意性、象似性和系统性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Oct;19(10):603-615. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013.
9
Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure.语言结构文化进化中的压缩与交流。
Cognition. 2015 Aug;141:87-102. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
How arbitrary is language?语言有多随意?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 19;369(1651):20130299. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0299.