Barnato Amber E, Angus Derek C
Center for Research on Health Care, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Place, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Crit Care Clin. 2004 Jul;20(3):345-62, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2004.03.002.
In the United States, intensive care unit (ICU) admission at the end of life is commonplace. What is the value and role of ICU mortality prediction models for informing the utility of ICU care?In this article, we review the history, statistical underpinnings,and current deployment of these models in clinical care. We conclude that the use of outcome prediction models to ration care that is unlikely to provide an expected benefit is hampered by imperfect performance, the lack of real-time availability, failure to consider functional outcomes beyond survival, and physician resistance to the use of probabilistic information when death is guaranteed by the decision it informs. Among these barriers, the most important technical deficiency is the lack of automated information systems to provide outcome predictions to decision makers, and the most important research and policy agenda is to understand and address our national ambivalence toward rationing care based on any criterion.
在美国,临终时入住重症监护病房(ICU)很常见。ICU死亡率预测模型对于告知ICU护理的效用有何价值和作用?在本文中,我们回顾了这些模型的历史、统计学基础以及它们在临床护理中的当前应用情况。我们得出结论,使用结果预测模型来合理分配不太可能带来预期益处的护理,受到模型性能不完善、缺乏实时可用性、未考虑生存之外的功能结果以及医生在其所依据的决策已确保死亡的情况下对使用概率信息的抵触等因素的阻碍。在这些障碍中,最重要的技术缺陷是缺乏向决策者提供结果预测的自动化信息系统,而最重要的研究和政策议程是理解并解决我们国家基于任何标准对护理配给的矛盾态度。