Holmström Inger, Larsson Jan, Lindberg Eva, Rosenqvist Urban
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala Science Park, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Jun;53(3):325-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.013.
There is relative consensus about the advantages of patient-centred consultations. However, they have not been easy to realise in clinical praxis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether an intervention focused on health care professionals' understanding of the diabetes-patient encounter could facilitate a patient-centred way to encounter these patients. Two GPs and two nurses participated in the year-long intervention. The intervention focused on the staff's understanding of the encounter. Staff video recorded four to five encounters each and reflected together with a supervisor on their understanding of the encounters and how they were conducted. The encounters were analysed with the Verona-MICS/Dr coding system and patients' comments were analysed separately. The content of the consultations and how they were conducted was also assessed. There was a significant change of two patient-centred items by the staff over time. Two staff seemed to change their educational model. Modern theories of competence development seem to be useful in clinical settings.
关于以患者为中心的会诊的优势,存在相对一致的看法。然而,在临床实践中实现这些优势并非易事。本研究的目的是调查一项专注于医护人员对糖尿病患者会诊理解的干预措施是否能够促进以患者为中心的方式来接诊这些患者。两名全科医生和两名护士参与了为期一年的干预。该干预集中于工作人员对会诊的理解。工作人员各自录制了四到五次会诊,并与一名主管一起反思他们对会诊的理解以及会诊的进行方式。会诊采用维罗纳 - MICS/Dr编码系统进行分析,患者的评论则单独进行分析。同时还评估了会诊的内容及其进行方式。随着时间的推移,工作人员在两个以患者为中心的项目上有了显著变化。两名工作人员似乎改变了他们的教育模式。现代能力发展理论在临床环境中似乎很有用。