Suppr超能文献

在糖尿病领域实施赋权小组教育。

Implementing empowerment group education in diabetes.

作者信息

Adolfsson Eva Thors, Smide Bibbi, Gregeby Emma, Fernström Lillemor, Wikblad Karin

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Jun;53(3):319-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.07.009.

Abstract

The overall aim was to gain insight into and understand how physicians and nurses view the implementation of empowerment group education (EGE) in diabetes. Prior to the study the physicians and nurses attended a 2-day empowerment workshop. Further, they had implemented the empowerment approach in two groups of patients with type II diabetes. Three to 9 months later they (five physicians and 11 nurses from six family practices) participated in focus group interviews to evaluate the implementation of the EGE. The interviews were audio-taped, transcribed and analysed using the constant comparative method. The main result showed a conflict in roles. The physicians and nurses knew their role in the traditional approach but not with respect to the empowerment approach, which they needed to grow into. At the same time as they started a new way of working, their role had changed from being an expert to being a facilitator. As experts they felt secure; as facilitators they needed support in their educational process. To implement EGE they required support both from the family practice and from a supervisor in direct connection with the EGE.

摘要

总体目标是深入了解并理解医生和护士如何看待糖尿病患者赋权小组教育(EGE)的实施情况。在研究之前,医生和护士参加了为期两天的赋权研讨会。此外,他们已在两组II型糖尿病患者中实施了赋权方法。三到九个月后,他们(来自六个家庭医疗诊所的五名医生和十一名护士)参加了焦点小组访谈,以评估EGE的实施情况。访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用持续比较法进行分析。主要结果显示存在角色冲突。医生和护士了解他们在传统方法中的角色,但对于他们需要逐渐适应的赋权方法并不了解。在他们开始新的工作方式的同时,他们的角色已从专家转变为促进者。作为专家,他们感到安心;作为促进者,他们在教育过程中需要支持。为实施EGE,他们既需要家庭医疗诊所的支持,也需要与EGE直接相关的上级的支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验