• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论风险的认识论:语言、逻辑与社会科学

On the epistemology of risk: language, logic and social science.

作者信息

Hayes M V

机构信息

Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1992 Aug;35(4):401-7. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90332-k.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90332-k
PMID:1519092
Abstract

'Risk' is a widely used concept in literatures related to health, health care and medicine. In recent decades, three bodies of literature have emerged in which 'risk' is the primary focus of concern: Health Risk Appraisal, the Risk Approach and Risk Analysis/Assessment/Management. These literatures overlook important concepts and theoretical developments in contemporary social science. They also lack conceptual coherence. Reduction of incoherence will require re-examination of the epistemology of risk in relation to both its language and its logic in light of developments in social science.

摘要

“风险”是与健康、医疗保健和医学相关的文献中广泛使用的概念。近几十年来,出现了三类以“风险”为主要关注点的文献:健康风险评估、风险方法以及风险分析/评估/管理。这些文献忽视了当代社会科学中的重要概念和理论发展。它们还缺乏概念上的连贯性。要减少不连贯性,就需要根据社会科学的发展,从风险的语言和逻辑两方面重新审视风险认识论。

相似文献

1
On the epistemology of risk: language, logic and social science.论风险的认识论:语言、逻辑与社会科学
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Aug;35(4):401-7. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90332-k.
2
Language, numeracy and logic in microbiome science.微生物组科学中的语言、计算能力和逻辑
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jul;16(7):387-388. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0163-5.
3
[Prevention and health promotion: a responsibility of social medicine?].[预防与健康促进:社会医学的一项职责?]
Gesundheitswesen. 1996 Oct;58 Suppl 3:169-73.
4
Health promotion and preventive services in primary care.
Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(4 Suppl):3-5.
5
Strengthening individual and community capacity to prevent disease and promote health: in search of relevant theories and principles.
Health Educ Q. 1995 Aug;22(3):290-306. doi: 10.1177/109019819402200304.
6
[Necessary and desirable future emphasis in social medicine from the theoretical viewpoint].
Gesundheitswesen. 2001 Mar;63(3):140-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-11968.
7
[Health resources--potentials and how to utilise them].
Gesundheitswesen. 2003 Mar;65(3):155-62. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38512.
8
[Improvement of medical care by supporting the intention to change health risk behavior].
Med Klin (Munich). 2007 Jan 15;102(1):33-6. doi: 10.1007/s00063-007-1006-7.
9
Concepts and Reasoning: a Conceptual Review and Analysis of Logical Issues in Empirical Social Science Research.概念与推理:对经验社会科学研究中逻辑问题的概念性回顾与分析。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Jun;58(2):502-530. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09792-x. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
10
Health promotion and disease prevention: will eastern Europe follow the lead?
J Allied Health. 1992 Summer;21(3):219-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental questions about sex chromosome aneuploidies regarding sex, gender, and sexual orientation as reported by genetic counselors in a prenatal setting.遗传咨询师在产前咨询中报告的父母关于性染色体非整倍体在性别、性取向方面的问题。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Feb;34(1):e1897. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1897. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
2
COVID-19, Framing and Naming a Pandemic: How What Is Not in a Disease Name May Be More Important than What Is.新冠疫情:大流行的框架与命名——疾病名称中未包含的内容可能比包含的内容更重要
Pathogens. 2023 Feb 18;12(2):346. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12020346.
3
Occupational Well-Being of Multidisciplinary PHC Teams: Barriers/Facilitators and Negotiations to Improve Working Conditions.
多学科初级卫生保健团队的职业幸福感:改善工作条件的障碍/促进因素和协商。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;19(23):15943. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315943.
4
Hearing health network: a spatial analysis.听力健康网络:一项空间分析。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 May-Jun;81(3):232-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
5
Risk perception and knowledge about osteoporosis: well informed but not aware? A cross-sectional study.骨质疏松症的风险认知与知识:了解充分但未意识到?一项横断面研究。
J Community Health. 2015 Apr;40(2):245-50. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9923-x.
6
Risk perception and risk communication for training women apprentice welders: a challenge for public health nursing.培训女性焊工学徒的风险认知与风险沟通:公共卫生护理面临的一项挑战。
Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:386260. doi: 10.1155/2013/386260. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
7
Risk communication as a tool for training apprentice welders: a study about risk perception and occupational accidents.风险沟通作为培训学徒焊工的一种工具:一项关于风险认知与职业事故的研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:140564. doi: 10.1100/2012/140564. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
8
Risk perception and occupational accidents: a study of gas station workers in southern Brazil.风险认知与职业事故:巴西南部加油站工人研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Jul;9(7):2362-77. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9072362. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
9
Uncertain Futures: Individual Risk and Social Context in Decision-Making in Cancer Screening.不确定的未来:癌症筛查决策中的个体风险与社会背景
Health Risk Soc. 2010 Apr;12(2):101-117. doi: 10.1080/13698571003637048.
10
Saramago's All the Names and the epidemiological dream.萨拉马戈的《所有的名字》与流行病学之梦。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Sep;58(9):743-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.013979.