Suppr超能文献

不确定的未来:癌症筛查决策中的个体风险与社会背景

Uncertain Futures: Individual Risk and Social Context in Decision-Making in Cancer Screening.

作者信息

Lee Simon J Craddock

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences Division of Ethics & Health Policy University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, USA.

出版信息

Health Risk Soc. 2010 Apr;12(2):101-117. doi: 10.1080/13698571003637048.

Abstract

A core logic of cancer control and prevention, like much in public health, turns on the notion of decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Population-level data are increasingly used to develop risk profiles, or estimates, that clinicians and the consumer public may use to guide individual decisions about cancer screening. Individual risk perception forms a piece of a larger social economy of decision-making and choice that makes population screening possible. Individual decision-making depends on accessing and interpreting available clinical information, filtered through the lens of personal values and both cognitive and affective behavioral processes. That process is also mediated by changing social roles and interpersonal relationships. This paper begins to elucidate the influence of this "social context" within the complexity of cancer screening. Reflecting on current work in risk and health, I consider how ethnographic narrative methods can enrich this model.

摘要

癌症控制与预防的一个核心逻辑,与公共卫生领域的许多方面一样,取决于不确定性条件下的决策概念。越来越多的人群层面数据被用于制定风险概况或估计值,临床医生和普通民众可以利用这些来指导有关癌症筛查的个人决策。个体风险认知构成了一个更大的决策与选择社会经济体系的一部分,正是这个体系使得人群筛查成为可能。个体决策取决于获取和解读可用的临床信息,这些信息通过个人价值观以及认知和情感行为过程的视角进行过滤。这个过程还受到不断变化的社会角色和人际关系的调节。本文开始阐明这种“社会背景”在癌症筛查复杂性中的影响。通过反思当前在风险与健康方面的工作,我思考了人种志叙事方法如何能够丰富这一模式。

相似文献

1
Uncertain Futures: Individual Risk and Social Context in Decision-Making in Cancer Screening.
Health Risk Soc. 2010 Apr;12(2):101-117. doi: 10.1080/13698571003637048.
2
Conviction Narrative Theory: A theory of choice under radical uncertainty.
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 May 30;46:e82. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22001157.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
[The role of information in public health decision-making].
Sante Publique. 2008 Jul-Aug;20(4):387-94. doi: 10.3917/spub.084.0387.
6
A Collaborator's Reputation Can Bias Decisions and Anxiety under Uncertainty.
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 28;38(9):2262-2269. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2337-17.2018. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
7
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
8
10
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Questioning 'Informed Choice' in Medical Screening: The Role of Neoliberal Rhetoric, Culture, and Social Context.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;11(9):1230. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091230.
2
Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Dec;29(12):2389-2394. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0861. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
4
The sociology of cancer: a decade of research.
Sociol Health Illn. 2018 Mar;40(3):552-576. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12662. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
Can you un-ring the bell? A qualitative study of how affect influences cancer screening decisions.
BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3596-7.
7
Deliberative and intuitive risk perceptions as predictors of colorectal cancer screening over time.
J Behav Med. 2016 Feb;39(1):65-74. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9667-9. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
9
Examining Intuitive Cancer Risk Perceptions in Haitian-Creole and Spanish-Speaking Populations.
J Transcult Nurs. 2016 Jul;27(4):368-75. doi: 10.1177/1043659614561679. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
10
Examining intuitive risk perceptions for cancer in diverse populations.
Health Risk Soc. 2014 Jan 1;16(3):227-242. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2014.911822.

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural context and modification of behavior change theory.
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5 Suppl):156S-60S; discussion 167S-71S. doi: 10.1177/1090198109340511.
2
Capitalizing on opportunities to refine health behavior theories.
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5 Suppl):150S-5S; discussion 167S-71S. doi: 10.1177/1090198109340514.
3
Theory building through qualitative research: marshalling opportunities to advance cancer screening efforts.
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5 Suppl):145S-9S; discussion 167S-71S. doi: 10.1177/1090198109340515.
4
Adult daughters' influence on mothers' health-related decision making: an expansion of the subjective norms construct.
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5 Suppl):129S-44S. doi: 10.1177/1090198109338904.
5
Intention, subjective norms, and cancer screening in the context of relational culture.
Health Educ Behav. 2009 Oct;36(5 Suppl):91S-110S. doi: 10.1177/1090198109338919.
7
Overdiagnosis and mammography screening.
BMJ. 2009 Jul 9;339:b1425. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1425.
8
The converged experience of risk and disease.
Milbank Q. 2009 Jun;87(2):417-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00563.x.
9
Laypersons' responses to the communication of uncertainty regarding cancer risk estimates.
Med Decis Making. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):391-403. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08327396. Epub 2009 May 21.
10
Conceptual problems in laypersons' understanding of individualized cancer risk: a qualitative study.
Health Expect. 2009 Mar;12(1):4-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00524.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验