Lee Simon J Craddock
Department of Clinical Sciences Division of Ethics & Health Policy University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, USA.
Health Risk Soc. 2010 Apr;12(2):101-117. doi: 10.1080/13698571003637048.
A core logic of cancer control and prevention, like much in public health, turns on the notion of decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Population-level data are increasingly used to develop risk profiles, or estimates, that clinicians and the consumer public may use to guide individual decisions about cancer screening. Individual risk perception forms a piece of a larger social economy of decision-making and choice that makes population screening possible. Individual decision-making depends on accessing and interpreting available clinical information, filtered through the lens of personal values and both cognitive and affective behavioral processes. That process is also mediated by changing social roles and interpersonal relationships. This paper begins to elucidate the influence of this "social context" within the complexity of cancer screening. Reflecting on current work in risk and health, I consider how ethnographic narrative methods can enrich this model.
癌症控制与预防的一个核心逻辑,与公共卫生领域的许多方面一样,取决于不确定性条件下的决策概念。越来越多的人群层面数据被用于制定风险概况或估计值,临床医生和普通民众可以利用这些来指导有关癌症筛查的个人决策。个体风险认知构成了一个更大的决策与选择社会经济体系的一部分,正是这个体系使得人群筛查成为可能。个体决策取决于获取和解读可用的临床信息,这些信息通过个人价值观以及认知和情感行为过程的视角进行过滤。这个过程还受到不断变化的社会角色和人际关系的调节。本文开始阐明这种“社会背景”在癌症筛查复杂性中的影响。通过反思当前在风险与健康方面的工作,我思考了人种志叙事方法如何能够丰富这一模式。