Ashley-Morrow R, Nollkamper J, Robinson N J, Bishop N, Smith J
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004 Jun;10(6):530-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00836.x.
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of Focus HerpeSelect ELISAs, sera or plasma samples from women aged 18-55 years were collected in ten cities from eight countries and tested by HerpeSelect HSV-1 ELISA (Focus-HSV-1) and by HerpeSelect HSV-2 ELISA (Focus-HSV-2). Sera with Focus-HSV-2-positive results were retested; 94% of the 3617 samples retested were positive. A subset of sera from each site was then selected, based on the HSV-2 results, and tested by Western blot (WB). The sensitivity and specificity were determined with samples from ten sites (n = 967) for Focus-HSV-1 and from seven sites (n = 675) for Focus-HSV-2. Focus-HSV-1 and WB results were concordant (both negative or both positive) for 97% of samples, with 99% sensitivity and 77% specificity. Specimens from Songkla, Thailand had 84% concordance with WB results for HSV-1, while three other sites had 100% concordance. Concordance of Focus-HSV-2 and WB was 92%, with 97% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Ibadan, Nigeria had 78% concordance. Focus-HSV-2 sensitivity and specificity in sites other than Ibadan were 97% and 93%, respectively. Raising the positive cut-off index value for HSV-2 from 1.1 to 3.5 yielded a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 96%. A sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 98% were achieved for sites other than Nigeria with the higher cut-off. In summary, the sensitivity and specificity of the Focus-HSV-1 and Focus-HSV-2 tests varied by site. Performance data generated in one area may not be applicable to other populations.
为确定Focus HerpeSelect酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的敏感性和特异性,在来自八个国家的十个城市收集了18至55岁女性的血清或血浆样本,并通过HerpeSelect HSV-1 ELISA(Focus-HSV-1)和HerpeSelect HSV-2 ELISA(Focus-HSV-2)进行检测。对Focus-HSV-2检测结果呈阳性的血清进行了重新检测;重新检测的3617份样本中有94%呈阳性。然后根据HSV-2检测结果,从每个地点选取一部分血清样本,并用蛋白质印迹法(WB)进行检测。确定了Focus-HSV-1在十个地点(n = 967)以及Focus-HSV-2在七个地点(n = 675)样本的敏感性和特异性。Focus-HSV-1和WB检测结果在97%的样本中一致(均为阴性或均为阳性),敏感性为99%,特异性为77%。泰国宋卡的样本与HSV-1的WB检测结果一致性为84%,而其他三个地点的一致性为100%。Focus-HSV-2与WB的一致性为92%,敏感性为97%,特异性为89%。尼日利亚伊巴丹的一致性为78%。在伊巴丹以外的地点,Focus-HSV-2的敏感性和特异性分别为97%和93%。将HSV-2的阳性临界指数值从1.1提高到3.5后,敏感性为90%,特异性为96%。采用较高临界值时,尼日利亚以外地点的敏感性为90%,特异性为98%。总之,Focus-HSV-1和Focus-HSV-2检测的敏感性和特异性因地点而异。在一个地区生成的性能数据可能不适用于其他人群。