Stanhope R, Albanese A, Moyle L, Hamill G
Medical Unit, Institute of Child Health, London.
Arch Dis Child. 1992 Aug;67(8):994-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.8.994.
The use of optimum conventional growth hormone administration, using a growth hormone vial combined with an Auto Injector, was compared with a pen injection system using a cartridge of growth hormone. In both methods of administration the concentration of growth hormone was 16 IU/ml. Thirty patients (22 boys, eight girls) who had all previously been treated with growth hormone (4 IU/ml) administered using needles and syringes (without an Auto Injector) were randomised into receiving one of either treatment for three months and then crossed over for a further three months. Fourteen patients (10 boys, four girls) initially received KabiVial 16 IU/ml combined with an Auto Injector while 16 patients (12 boys, four girls) were treated with KabiPen 16 IU/ml. Mean age in both groups was 9.6 years. The majority of patients in both groups were treated with a regimen of either 15 or 20 units/m2/week as a daily subcutaneous injection. Of the 30 patients who started in this trial, two who commenced using an Auto Injector refused to change to a pen system and were excluded from further analysis. When scored on a scale of -5 to +5 general convenience when changing from an Auto Injector to the KabiPen decreased from +4.7 to +1.0. When assessed for pain, the Auto Injector group scored +4.7, which decreased to -0.2 (more painful) for the pen. At the end of the trial 23 patients (82%) chose to continue with the KabiVial/Auto Injector combination as they found this less painful and the child did not see the needle or need to insert the needle manually. Five patients (18%) continued with the KabiPen as they considered the device smaller and easier to use. The accuracy of dosing using KabiVial was 100% compared with the range of 88% to 111% using KabiPen as the latter was available only in 0.5 unit increments. No growth hormone was wasted using KabiVial, although a mean of 0.6 units was wasted with every 16 IU cartridge in the KabiPen system. It is concluded that patients should be able to contribute to the choice of growth hormone delivery systems and that newer methods need careful assessment.
将使用生长激素瓶与自动注射器组合的最佳常规生长激素给药方法,与使用生长激素笔芯的笔式注射系统进行比较。在两种给药方法中,生长激素的浓度均为16IU/ml。30名患者(22名男孩,8名女孩)之前均接受过使用针头和注射器(无自动注射器)给予的生长激素(4IU/ml)治疗,他们被随机分为接受其中一种治疗三个月,然后交叉接受另一种治疗三个月。14名患者(10名男孩,4名女孩)最初接受了16IU/ml的卡比瓶与自动注射器的组合,而16名患者(12名男孩,4名女孩)接受了16IU/ml的卡比笔治疗。两组的平均年龄均为9.6岁。两组中的大多数患者均接受了每周每平方米15或20单位的皮下每日注射方案。在这项试验开始的30名患者中,两名开始使用自动注射器的患者拒绝改用笔式系统,并被排除在进一步分析之外。从自动注射器改为卡比笔时,以-5至+5的量表对总体便利性进行评分,评分从+4.7降至+1.0。在评估疼痛时,自动注射器组的评分为+4.7,而笔式注射组的评分降至-0.2(更疼痛)。在试验结束时,23名患者(82%)选择继续使用卡比瓶/自动注射器组合,因为他们发现这种方式疼痛较轻,而且孩子看不到针头,也无需手动插入针头。5名患者(18%)继续使用卡比笔,因为他们认为该装置更小且更易于使用。使用卡比瓶给药的准确性为100%,而使用卡比笔时的准确性范围为88%至111%,因为卡比笔仅以0.5单位的增量提供。使用卡比瓶时没有生长激素浪费,尽管在卡比笔系统中,每16IU笔芯平均浪费0.6单位。结论是患者应该能够参与生长激素给药系统的选择,并且新方法需要仔细评估。