Dröes R-M, Breebaart E, Meiland F J M, Van Tilburg W, Mellenbergh G J
Department of Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit medical centre, Alzheimer Centre, Valeriusplein 9, 1075 BG Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Aging Ment Health. 2004 May;8(3):201-11. doi: 10.1080/13607860410001669732.
The study tested the hypotheses that integrated support, in which patients and carers are both supported by one professional staff member, will be more effective in reducing the feelings of (over)burden of carers and in positively influencing some potential determinants of experienced burden than non-integrated support, such as psychogeriatric day-care. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group design was applied with matched groups and measurements at baseline and after seven months. Fifty-five of the eighty dyads (31% dropped out) of persons with mild-to-moderate dementia and their carers who presented for four community meeting centres and three day-care centres in nursing homes over an 18 month period, were included in the study. The carers in the Meeting Centres Support (MCS) Program participated in an integrated family support program together with the persons with dementia, while the carers in the control group only received respite through psychogeriatric day-care. Standardized questionnaires were applied to measure some indicators of burden experienced by the carers (feelings of stress, life dissatisfaction, psychological and psychosomatic complaints), as well as some potential determinants of experienced burden (feeling of competence, coping strategies, experienced support and loneliness). Furthermore, as an indicator of feelings of (over)burden of the carer, the time between start of participation in one of the programs and institutionalization in a nursing home was calculated. After seven months the carers in the MCS group (n = 36), compared to the carers in regular psychogeriatric day-care (n = 19), showed a moderate positive effect on the feeling of competence (effect size 0.45). No effect was found on feelings of stress, dissatisfaction or psychological and psychosomatic complaints. However, as compared to the control group in regular day-care, the persons with dementia in the MCS Program participated for a longer period of time before they were placed in a nursing home. The MCS Program proved more effective than psychogeriatric day-care in influencing the feeling of competence of the carers, and seems to lead to an increased delay of nursing home placement of the person with dementia, as compared to regular day-care. Because of the small sample and limited power of the study, and the possible influence of the selection of carers on the study outcome, further research into the value of meeting centres for carers of people with dementia is recommended.
与非综合支持(如老年精神科日间护理)相比,综合支持(即患者和护理者均由一名专业工作人员提供支持)在减轻护理者的(过度)负担感以及对一些体验到的负担的潜在决定因素产生积极影响方面会更有效。采用了准实验性的前测/后测对照组设计,对匹配组进行了基线和七个月后的测量。在18个月期间,向四个社区会议中心和三个养老院日间护理中心就诊的80对轻度至中度痴呆患者及其护理者中,有55对(31%退出)被纳入研究。会议中心支持(MCS)项目中的护理者与痴呆患者一起参加了一个综合家庭支持项目,而对照组中的护理者仅通过老年精神科日间护理获得喘息照顾。使用标准化问卷来测量护理者体验到的负担的一些指标(压力感、生活不满意感、心理和身心不适),以及体验到的负担的一些潜在决定因素(能力感、应对策略、体验到的支持和孤独感)。此外,作为护理者(过度)负担感的一个指标,计算了参与其中一个项目开始到入住养老院之间的时间。七个月后,与接受常规老年精神科日间护理的护理者(n = 19)相比,MCS组的护理者(n = 36)在能力感方面显示出中等程度的积极效果(效应大小为0.45)。在压力感、不满意感或心理和身心不适方面未发现效果。然而,与常规日间护理对照组相比,MCS项目中的痴呆患者在被安置到养老院之前参与的时间更长。与常规日间护理相比,MCS项目在影响护理者的能力感方面被证明比老年精神科日间护理更有效,并且似乎导致痴呆患者入住养老院的延迟增加。由于样本量小和研究效能有限,以及护理者选择可能对研究结果产生的影响,建议对痴呆患者护理者会议中心的价值进行进一步研究。