• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

准分子原位角膜磨镶术与准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术治疗高度近视的对比研究

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia.

作者信息

Kim Jin Kook, Kim Sung Soo, Lee Hyung Keun, Lee In Sik, Seong Gong Je, Kim Eung Kweon, Han Sueng Han

机构信息

Balgensesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Jul;30(7):1405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.12.053.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.12.053
PMID:15210215
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) in the treatment of high myopia.

SETTING

Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, South Korea.

METHODS

Four hundred seventy eyes of 240 patients with manifest refraction spherical components greater than -6.00 diopters (D) were assigned to 2 groups: 324 eyes (167 patients) were treated with LASIK and 146 eyes (73 patients), with LASEK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), remaining refractive error, corneal haze, and complications were followed in both groups for 12 months.

RESULTS

At 12 months, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia in 205 eyes (63.3%) in the LASIK group and 81 eyes (55.5%) in the LASEK group and within +/-1.00 D in 261 eyes (80.6%) and 104 eyes (71.2%), respectively. The UCVA was 20/25 or better in 269 LASIK eyes (83.0%) and 111 LASEK eyes (76.0%). There was more than a 1-line loss of BSCVA in 4 LASIK eyes (1.2%) and 21 LASEK eyes (14.3%). The between-group differences in SE, magnitude of cylinder, UCVA, and haze were statistically significant (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both LASIK and LASEK were safe and effectively treated eyes with high myopia. Laser in situ keratomileusis provided superior results in visual predictability and corneal opacity.

摘要

目的

比较准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)和准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗高度近视的视觉和屈光效果。

设置

韩国首尔延世大学医学院眼科视觉研究所和Balgeunsesang眼科诊所。

方法

将240例明显屈光球镜成分大于-6.00屈光度(D)的患者的470只眼分为两组:324只眼(167例患者)接受LASIK治疗,146只眼(73例患者)接受LASEK治疗。两组均随访12个月,观察裸眼视力(UCVA)、最佳矫正视力(BSCVA)、残余屈光不正、角膜混浊及并发症情况。

结果

12个月时,LASIK组205只眼(63.3%)和LASEK组81只眼(55.5%)的平均球镜等效度(SE)在正视眼的±0.50 D范围内,分别有261只眼(80.6%)和104只眼(71.2%)在±1.00 D范围内。LASIK组269只眼(83.0%)和LASEK组111只眼(76.0%)的UCVA达到20/25或更好。4只LASIK眼(1.2%)和21只LASEK眼(14.3%)的BSCVA下降超过1行。两组在SE、柱镜度数、UCVA和混浊程度方面的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

LASIK和LASEK治疗高度近视均安全有效,但准分子原位角膜磨镶术在视觉可预测性和角膜混浊方面效果更佳。

相似文献

1
Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia.准分子原位角膜磨镶术与准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术治疗高度近视的对比研究
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Jul;30(7):1405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.12.053.
2
A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.激光上皮下角膜磨镶术与准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗轻中度近视的对照匹配比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;142(6):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
3
Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.准分子原位角膜磨镶术与表面切削术:视觉效果及并发症
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Dec;33(12):2041-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.07.026.
4
Effect of amniotic membrane after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy on epithelial healing: clinical and refractive outcomes.激光辅助上皮下角膜磨镶术后羊膜对上皮愈合的影响:临床及屈光结果
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Feb;30(2):334-40. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00575-3.
5
Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术与机械法准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术矫正近视及近视散光的视觉效果比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;146(3):357-362. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.022. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
6
Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术治疗准分子原位角膜磨镶术后残余屈光不正的疗效
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Apr;33(4):642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.012.
7
Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.波前引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术与准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术后高阶像差的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 May;32(5):779-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.10.033.
8
Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group.用于中高度近视的球面和非球面光性屈光性角膜切削术及准分子原位角膜磨镶术:两项前瞻性随机临床试验。Summit技术公司PRK-LASIK研究组
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1998;96:197-221; discussion 221-7.
9
Analysis of the efficacy, predictability, and safety of LASEK for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 excimer laser.使用Technolas 217准分子激光对LASEK治疗近视和近视散光的疗效、可预测性及安全性进行分析。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Oct;30(10):2138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.083.
10
CustomVue laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Visx S4 excimer laser: Efficacy, predictability, and safety.使用威视S4准分子激光的CustomVue准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视和近视散光:疗效、可预测性及安全性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Mar;32(3):475-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.128.

引用本文的文献

1
A pilot study: LASEK with the Triple-A profile of a MEL 90 for mild and moderate myopia.一项试点研究:使用MEL 90的三重A模式进行准分子上皮下角膜磨镶术治疗轻度和中度近视。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 23;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0493-4.
2
Single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in high myopia: qualitative and quantitative visual functions.高度近视的单步经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术:定性和定量视觉功能
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 18;10(3):445-452. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.03.19. eCollection 2017.
3
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.
准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)与准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)治疗近视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 15;2(2):CD011080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011080.pub2.
4
Factors Affecting Long-term Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Moderate Myopia.准分子原位角膜磨镶术和准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术治疗中度近视后影响长期近视回退的因素
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;30(2):92-100. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2016.30.2.92. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
5
Laser-Assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy versus Laser In Situ Keratomileusis in Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.近视患者中准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术与准分子原位角膜磨镶术的系统评价和Meta分析
ISRN Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun 12;2014:672146. doi: 10.1155/2014/672146. eCollection 2014.
6
[A prospective intraindividual comparison between laser in situ keratomileusis and laser subepithelial keratectomy for myopia. 1-year follow-up results].[准分子原位角膜磨镶术与准分子上皮下角膜磨镶术治疗近视的前瞻性个体内比较。1年随访结果]
Ophthalmologe. 2008 Oct;105(10):921-6. doi: 10.1007/s00347-008-1726-y.