• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激活的人类c-Ha-ras-1癌基因作为一种诱变剂。

The activated human c-Ha-ras-1 oncogene as a mutagen.

作者信息

Baron H M, Bobrisheva I V, Varshaver N B

机构信息

Laboratory of Somatic Cell Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.

出版信息

Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1992 Aug;62(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(92)90030-c.

DOI:10.1016/0165-4608(92)90030-c
PMID:1521228
Abstract

The induction of gene mutations and chromosome aberrations by plasmid pEJ6.6 carrying the activated c-Ha-ras-1 oncogene from human bladder carcinoma was studied in cultured Chinese hamster cells. Both an increase in the frequency of hypoxanthine-phosphoribosyltransferase-deficient (HPRT-) mutants and chromosome aberrations was observed after pEJ6.6 transfection as compared to control series (pBR322). In order to define whether it is the oncogene which is responsible for the mutagenic effect of pEJ6.6, a derivative of c-Ha-ras-1 carrying a deletion in its coding region was constructed. As shown in all experiments, the frequency of HPRT- mutants after treatment with pEJ6.6 plasmid exceeded that in control dishes treated by pEJ6.6 plasmid with an inactivated oncogene. The effect was rather weak but statistically significant. Thus, the results of experiments carried out show that the mutagenic activity of pEJ6.6 plasmid is chiefly determined by its oncogene. The role of the mutagenic effects of activated oncogenes in malignant transformation is discussed.

摘要

研究了携带源自人膀胱癌的活化型c-Ha-ras-1癌基因的质粒pEJ6.6在培养的中国仓鼠细胞中诱导基因突变和染色体畸变的情况。与对照系列(pBR322)相比,pEJ6.6转染后观察到次黄嘌呤-磷酸核糖基转移酶缺陷(HPRT-)突变体频率和染色体畸变均增加。为了确定是否是癌基因导致了pEJ6.6的诱变作用,构建了一种在其编码区带有缺失的c-Ha-ras-1衍生物。如所有实验所示,用pEJ6.6质粒处理后的HPRT-突变体频率超过了用无活性癌基因的pEJ6.6质粒处理的对照培养皿中的频率。该效应相当微弱但具有统计学意义。因此,所进行的实验结果表明,pEJ6.6质粒的诱变活性主要由其癌基因决定。讨论了活化癌基因的诱变作用在恶性转化中的作用。

相似文献

1
The activated human c-Ha-ras-1 oncogene as a mutagen.激活的人类c-Ha-ras-1癌基因作为一种诱变剂。
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1992 Aug;62(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(92)90030-c.
2
[Role of activated cellular c-Ha-ras-1 oncogene in the mutagenic effect of the plasmid pEJ6.6].[活化的细胞c-Ha-ras-1癌基因在质粒pEJ6.6诱变效应中的作用]
Genetika. 1992 Aug;28(8):5-12.
3
[The plasmid pEJ6.6 carrying the activated c-Ha-ras-1 oncogene increases the mutation frequency in Chinese hamster cells].携带激活型c-Ha-ras-1癌基因的质粒pEJ6.6增加了中国仓鼠细胞的突变频率。
Genetika. 1992 Jun;28(6):35-40.
4
[Plasmid pSVc-myc-1 induces gene mutations and chromosome aberrations in cultured Chinese hamster cells].[质粒pSVc-myc-1在培养的中国仓鼠细胞中诱导基因突变和染色体畸变]
Tsitol Genet. 1993 Jul-Aug;27(4):51-5.
5
[Characteristics of mutants induced by the c-Ha-ras1 oncogene and the nature of the oncogene's mutagenic action].[c-Ha-ras1癌基因诱导的突变体特征及癌基因诱变作用的本质]
Genetika. 1995 Dec;31(12):1598-604.
6
DNA vaccine against oncogenic hamster cells transformed by HPV16 E6/E7 oncogenes and the activated ras oncogene.针对由人乳头瘤病毒16型E6/E7致癌基因和激活的ras致癌基因转化的致癌仓鼠细胞的DNA疫苗。
Oncol Rep. 1999 Jan-Feb;6(1):211-5. doi: 10.3892/or.6.1.211.
7
Transfected c-Ha-ras oncogene enhances karyotypic instability and integrates predominantly in aberrant chromosomes.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1993 May;67(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(93)90041-j.
8
Malignant transformation of a preneoplastic hamster epidermal cell line by the EJ c-Ha-ras-oncogene.EJ c-Ha-ras癌基因对癌前仓鼠表皮细胞系的恶性转化
Cancer Res. 1986 Mar;46(3):1458-64.
9
[The effect of Ha-ras oncogene on cells immortalized by the gene for polyomavirus large T-antigen].[哈-拉斯癌基因对由多瘤病毒大T抗原基因永生化的细胞的影响]
Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol. 1990 Feb(2):19-22.
10
Oncogene protein co-expression. Value of Ha-ras, c-myc, c-fos, and p53 as prognostic discriminants for breast carcinoma.癌基因蛋白共表达。Ha-ras、c-myc、c-fos和p53作为乳腺癌预后判别指标的价值。
Ann Surg. 1995 Jun;221(6):706-18; discussion 718-20. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199506000-00010.