Newby P K, Tucker Katherine L
Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Nutr Rev. 2004 May;62(5):177-203. doi: 10.1301/nr.2004.may.177-203.
This paper reviews studies performed to date that have employed cluster or factor analysis to empirically derive eating patterns. Since 1980, at least 93 studies were published that used cluster or factor analysis to define dietary exposures, of which 65 were used to test hypotheses or examine associations between patterns and disease outcomes or biomarkers. Studies were conducted in diverse populations across many countries and continents and suggest that patterns are associated with many different biomarkers and disease outcomes, whether measured by cluster or factor analysis. Despite clear differences in approaches and interpretations, there is some evidence that underlying eating patterns are revealed by either method. Although the research considered herein has created a meaningful body of literature, refining both the factor and cluster analysis methods will help to further establish eating patterns as a sound dietary assessment method.
本文回顾了迄今为止采用聚类或因子分析从实证角度推导饮食模式的研究。自1980年以来,至少发表了93项使用聚类或因子分析来定义饮食暴露的研究,其中65项用于检验假设或研究饮食模式与疾病结局或生物标志物之间的关联。这些研究在许多国家和各大洲的不同人群中开展,结果表明,无论通过聚类分析还是因子分析来衡量,饮食模式都与许多不同的生物标志物和疾病结局相关。尽管在方法和解释上存在明显差异,但有证据表明两种方法都能揭示潜在的饮食模式。虽然本文所考虑的研究已形成了有意义的文献体系,但完善因子分析和聚类分析方法将有助于进一步确立饮食模式作为一种可靠的饮食评估方法。