Meilijson Sara R, Kasher Asa, Elizur Avner
Department of Communication Disorders, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Jun;47(3):695-713. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/053).
In this study, the authors examined the language of 43 participants with chronic schizophrenia under the basic assumption that a paradigmatic shift is needed in the methodology used to investigate the language of schizophrenia. The pragmatic protocol (C. Prutting and D. Kirchner, 1987) was chosen as the method of analysis to attain a general profile of pragmatic abilities. The results showed that the participants with schizophrenia exhibited a high degree of inappropriate pragmatic abilities compared to participants with mixed anxiety-depression disorder and participants with hemispheric brain damage, as previously assessed by Prutting and Kirchner. Statistical methods for clustering analysis yielded 5 distinct parameter clusters: Topic, Speech Acts, Turn-Taking, Lexical, and Nonverbal. Group clustering analysis of the 43 participants with schizophrenia produced 3 distinct groups with different profiles: minimal impairment, lexical impairment, and interactional impairment. The results are discussed in terms of theoretical implications in the area of pragmatics, the diagnosis of schizophrenia, and other goals.
在本研究中,作者对43名慢性精神分裂症患者的语言进行了研究,其基本假设是,用于研究精神分裂症语言的方法需要发生范式转变。选择语用协议(C. Prutting和D. Kirchner,1987年)作为分析方法,以获得语用能力的总体概况。结果表明,与混合性焦虑抑郁障碍患者和半球脑损伤患者相比,精神分裂症患者表现出高度不适当的语用能力,这是Prutting和Kirchner之前评估得出的结论。聚类分析的统计方法产生了5个不同的参数聚类:主题、言语行为、话轮转换、词汇和非言语。对43名精神分裂症患者进行的组聚类分析产生了3个具有不同特征的不同组:轻度损伤、词汇损伤和互动损伤。从语用学领域的理论意义、精神分裂症的诊断及其他目标等方面对结果进行了讨论。