Suppr超能文献

应用于语义流畅性任务的计算语言学分析,以测量精神分裂症中的离题和离题倾向。

Computational linguistic analysis applied to a semantic fluency task to measure derailment and tangentiality in schizophrenia.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2018 May;263:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.037. Epub 2018 Feb 17.

Abstract

Although rating scales to assess formal thought disorder exist, there are no objective, high-reliability instruments that can quantify and track it. This proof-of-concept study shows that CoVec, a new automated tool, is able to differentiate between controls and patients with schizophrenia with derailment and tangentiality. According to ratings from the derailment and tangentiality items of the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, we divided the sample into three groups: controls, patients without formal thought disorder, and patients with derailment/tangentiality. Their lists of animals produced during a one-minute semantic fluency task were processed using CoVec, a newly developed software that measures the semantic similarity of words based on vector semantic analysis. CoVec outputs were Mean Similarity, Coherence, Coherence-5, and Coherence-10. Patients with schizophrenia produced fewer words than controls. Patients with derailment had a significantly lower mean number of words and lower Coherence-5 than controls and patients without derailment. Patients with tangentiality had significantly lower Coherence-5 and Coherence-10 than controls and patients without tangentiality. Despite the small samples of patients with clinically apparent thought disorder, CoVec was able to detect subtle differences between controls and patients with either or both of the two forms of disorganization.

摘要

虽然有评估正式思维障碍的量表,但目前还没有能够量化和跟踪思维障碍的客观、高可靠性工具。这项概念验证研究表明,新型自动化工具 CoVec 能够区分精神分裂症患者和对照组的思维奔逸和离题。根据阳性症状评估量表中思维奔逸和离题项目的评分,我们将样本分为三组:对照组、无正式思维障碍的患者组和有思维奔逸/离题的患者组。他们在一分钟语义流畅性任务中生成的动物列表使用 CoVec 进行处理,这是一种新开发的软件,基于向量语义分析来衡量单词的语义相似度。CoVec 的输出结果为平均相似度、连贯性、连贯性-5 和连贯性-10。精神分裂症患者生成的单词数少于对照组。有思维奔逸的患者的平均单词数和连贯性-5 明显低于对照组和无思维奔逸的患者。有离题的患者的连贯性-5 和连贯性-10 明显低于对照组和无离题的患者。尽管有明显思维障碍的患者样本量较小,但 CoVec 仍能够检测到对照组和两种形式紊乱患者之间的细微差异。

相似文献

1
Computational linguistic analysis applied to a semantic fluency task to measure derailment and tangentiality in schizophrenia.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 May;263:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.037. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
4
Cognitive substrates of thought disorder, I: the semantic system.
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;155(12):1671-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.12.1671.
5
Effect of retrieval effort and switching demand on fMRI activation during semantic word generation in schizophrenia.
Schizophr Res. 2008 Feb;99(1-3):312-23. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.11.017. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
6
Assessing the Relationship between Semantic Processing and Thought Disorder Symptoms in Schizophrenia.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 Sep;21(8):629-38. doi: 10.1017/S1355617715000648. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
7
Disordered semantic activation in disorganized discourse in schizophrenia: a new pragma-linguistic tool for structure and meaning reconstruction.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 May-Jun;48(3):320-8. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12011. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
9
Formal thought disorder in schizophrenia: an executive or a semantic deficit?
Psychol Med. 2005 Jan;35(1):121-32. doi: 10.1017/s003329170400279x.

引用本文的文献

1
Naturalistic computational psychiatry: How to get there?
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2025 Feb 7;50(1):E67-E72. doi: 10.1503/jpn.250009. Print 2025 Jan-Feb.
2
Leveraging relatedness-based measures in people with language disorders: A scoping review.
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Jun;19(2):299-337. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12405. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
4
Automated analysis of speech as a marker of sub-clinical psychotic experiences.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 1;14:1265880. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1265880. eCollection 2023.
5
Linguistic findings in persons with schizophrenia-a review of the current literature.
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 21;14:1287706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287706. eCollection 2023.
6
Trajectories through semantic spaces in schizophrenia and the relationship to ripple bursts.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 17;120(42):e2305290120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305290120. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
7
Theory-Driven Analysis of Natural Language Processing Measures of Thought Disorder Using Generative Language Modeling.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Oct;8(10):1013-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 29.
8
Lower cohesion and altered first-person pronoun usage in the spoken life narratives of individuals with schizophrenia.
Schizophr Res. 2023 Sep;259:140-149. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.04.001. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
9
Accumulating evidence for myriad alternatives: Modeling the generation of free association.
Psychol Rev. 2023 Nov;130(6):1492-1520. doi: 10.1037/rev0000397. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

2
Thoughts About Disordered Thinking: Measuring and Quantifying the Laws of Order and Disorder.
Schizophr Bull. 2017 May 1;43(3):509-513. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx040.
3
Rethinking Thought Disorder.
Schizophr Bull. 2017 May;43(3):514-522. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx003. Epub 2017 Jan 15.
4
Automated analysis of free speech predicts psychosis onset in high-risk youths.
NPJ Schizophr. 2015 Aug 26;1:15030. doi: 10.1038/npjschz.2015.30. eCollection 2015.
5
Automated computerized analysis of speech in psychiatric disorders.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014 May;27(3):203-9. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000056.
7
Speech graphs provide a quantitative measure of thought disorder in psychosis.
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034928. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
8
Detecting order-disorder transitions in discourse: implications for schizophrenia.
Schizophr Res. 2011 Sep;131(1-3):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.04.026. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
9
Language in schizophrenia Part 1: an Introduction.
Lang Linguist Compass. 2010 Aug;4(8):576-589. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00216.x.
10
An automated method to analyze language use in patients with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives.
J Neurolinguistics. 2010 May 1;23(3):270-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.05.002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验