Bull F C, Bellew B, Schöppe S, Bauman A E
School of Human Movement and Exercise Science, The University of Western Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2004 Apr;7(1 Suppl):93-104. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(04)80283-4.
Physical activity (PA) is increasingly considered an important public health issue and as such requires the development of good public health policy. This paper provides a summary of the literature on policy development and defines what a policy on PA may usefully comprise. The results of an international review of national level PA policies, using a defined set of criteria, are reported. Considerable similarities were found in the methods and approaches to policy development on PA across countries, with most adopting an intersectoral approach, with consultation and partnership between sectors occurring at a high level of government. The need for action across the lifespan is recognised, as is the need for multiple strategies across a variety of settings. A review of Australian PA policy found that, after promising strategic developments through Active Australia in the late 1990s, PA policy and the role of the federal health sector has become less clear, with PA policy existing now only as a component part integrated into other chronic disease prevention policy initiatives. Recommendations towards better practice in policy making are made with particular reference to developing a clearly defined integrated national PA policy in the Australian context.
体育活动(PA)日益被视为一个重要的公共卫生问题,因此需要制定完善的公共卫生政策。本文概述了有关政策制定的文献,并界定了PA政策可能有效涵盖的内容。报告了一项使用既定标准对国家级PA政策进行国际审查的结果。各国在PA政策制定的方法和途径上存在相当多的相似之处,大多数国家采用跨部门方法,各部门之间在政府高层进行协商与合作。人们认识到在整个生命周期采取行动的必要性,以及在各种环境中采取多种策略的必要性。对澳大利亚PA政策的审查发现,在20世纪90年代末通过“活跃澳大利亚”取得了有前景的战略发展之后,PA政策以及联邦卫生部门的作用变得不那么明确,目前PA政策仅作为一个组成部分纳入其他慢性病预防政策举措之中。文中特别针对在澳大利亚背景下制定明确界定的综合性国家PA政策,提出了关于改进政策制定实践的建议。