Suppr超能文献

多中心研究中精液评估实验室方法的质量控制

Quality control of laboratory methods for semen evaluation in a multicenter research study.

作者信息

Brazil Charlene, Swan Shanna H, Tollner Charlene R, Treece Cathy, Drobnis Erma Z, Wang Christina, Redmon J Bruce, Overstreet James W

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, 95616, USA.

出版信息

J Androl. 2004 Jul-Aug;25(4):645-56. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02836.x.

Abstract

Rigorously standardized laboratory protocols and strict quality control (QC) are essential for meaningful comparisons between semen quality data from multiple sites. We describe our experience with the Study for Future Families (SFF), a multicenter study of semen quality in the United States. Detailed protocols were developed, and technicians from each study site attended a training session at the central laboratory. Technicians received blinded replicates from diluted semen specimens for counting by MicroCell and hemacytometer. Sperm motility was assessed using videotaped recordings for simple percent motility and categorical assessment of individual sperm progression as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). The mean intertechnician coefficient of variation for individual specimens was 12.6% for MicroCell counts, 15.2% for hemacytometer counts, and 10.5% for percent motility. Intratechnician coefficients of variation averaged 10.3% for MicroCell counts, 12.5% for hemacytometer counts, and 5.2% for percent motility. The average percent differences between the technicians' values and the central standard for individual specimens were 13.5%, 16.6%, and 11.9% for MicroCell counts, hemacytometer counts, and simple percent motility, respectively. We achieved our goal of maintaining mean intratechnician coefficients of variation and mean percent differences from the standard values of 15% or less for measurements of simple percent motility and sperm concentration by MicroCell. Standardization using the Improved Neubauer hemacytometer chamber proved more difficult. We were not successful in standardizing a method for categorical assessment of individual sperm progression.

摘要

严格标准化的实验室方案和严格的质量控制(QC)对于多个地点精液质量数据之间有意义的比较至关重要。我们描述了我们在未来家庭研究(SFF)中的经验,这是一项美国精液质量的多中心研究。制定了详细的方案,每个研究地点的技术人员在中央实验室参加了培训课程。技术人员收到稀释精液标本的盲法重复样本,用于通过MicroCell和血细胞计数器进行计数。精子活力通过录像记录进行评估,按照世界卫生组织(WHO)的建议,评估简单活力百分比和单个精子前进的分类评估。单个标本的技术人员间变异系数,MicroCell计数为12.6%,血细胞计数器计数为15.2%,活力百分比为10.5%。技术人员内变异系数,MicroCell计数平均为10.3%,血细胞计数器计数为12.5%,活力百分比为5.2%。技术人员的数值与单个标本的中央标准之间的平均百分比差异,MicroCell计数、血细胞计数器计数和简单活力百分比分别为13.5%、16.6%和11.9%。我们实现了保持技术人员内变异系数均值以及与MicroCell测量的简单活力百分比和精子浓度标准值的平均百分比差异在15%或更低的目标。使用改良的Neubauer血细胞计数板进行标准化证明更困难。我们未能成功标准化单个精子前进分类评估的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验