O'Sullivan Dominic, Sennerby Lars, Meredith Neil
Bristol Dental School, Bristol, UK.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):474-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01041.x.
The study presented was designed to analyse the mechanical performance and the primary and secondary stability characteristics of endosseous titanium implants with 1 degree (EXP1) and 2 degrees (EXP2) of taper when compared with the standard Brånemark design (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden).
One pair of 10 mm EXP1 and control implants were placed in the femoral condyles of six rabbits. Paired 6 mm EXP1 and control implants and 6 mm EXP2 and control implants were placed in the tibial metaphysis. The control implants used were 4 mm diameter standard Brånemark implants, the same length as the test implants. At placement, insertion torque (IT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were performed. Six weeks postoperatively when the animals were killed, RFA and removal torque (RT) measurements were made.
At placement, significantly higher IT was needed to insert the EXP implants compared with the controls. RFA values were significantly higher for EXP1 implants placed in the tibia but not in the femur. In pooling data from the femur and tibia there was a significant difference. The EXP2 implants failed to insert fully and demonstrated a lower RFA value than may have been expected due to the exposed threads, although this difference was not statistically significant.
The results from the present study showed that 1 degrees of taper results in a better primary stability compared with the standard Brånemark design. There was no evidence that the tapered design caused negative bone tissue reactions. All the implants gained in stability during the healing period.
本研究旨在分析与标准的布兰emark设计(诺贝尔生物保健公司,瑞典哥德堡)相比,锥度为1度(EXP1)和2度(EXP2)的骨内钛种植体的力学性能以及一级和二级稳定性特征。
将一对10毫米的EXP1种植体和对照种植体植入六只兔子的股骨髁。将配对的6毫米EXP1种植体和对照种植体以及6毫米EXP2种植体和对照种植体植入胫骨近端。所使用的对照种植体是直径4毫米的标准布兰emark种植体,与测试种植体长度相同。在植入时,进行插入扭矩(IT)和共振频率分析(RFA)测量。术后六周处死动物时,进行RFA和去除扭矩(RT)测量。
在植入时,与对照相比,插入EXP种植体需要显著更高的IT。植入胫骨的EXP1种植体的RFA值显著更高,但植入股骨的则不然。汇总股骨和胫骨的数据存在显著差异。EXP2种植体未能完全插入,并且由于螺纹暴露,其RFA值低于预期,尽管这种差异没有统计学意义。
本研究结果表明,与标准的布兰emark设计相比,1度的锥度可带来更好的一级稳定性。没有证据表明这种锥形设计会引起负面的骨组织反应。所有种植体在愈合期稳定性均有所增加。