Albert X, Huertas I, Pereiró I I, Sanfélix J, Gosalbes V, Perrota C
Health Center of Marco Merenciano, Conselleria de Sanidad, Marco Merenciano no 26, Valencia, Spain, 46025.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(3):CD001209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001209.pub2.
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common health care problem. Recurrent UTI (RUTI) in healthy non-pregnant women is defined as three or more episodes of UTI during a twelve month period. Long-term antibiotics have been proposed as a prevention strategy for RUTI.
To determine the efficacy (during and after) and safety of prophylactic antibiotics used to prevent uncomplicated RUTI in adult non-pregnant women.
We searched MEDLINE (1966-April 2004), EMBASE (1980-January 2003), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials( in The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004) and reference lists of retrieved articles
Any published randomised controlled trial where antibiotics were used as prophylactic therapy in RUTI.
Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Nineteen studies involving 1120 women were eligible for inclusion. Antibiotic versus antibiotic (10 trials, 430 women): During active prophylaxis the rate range of microbiological recurrence patient-year (MRPY) was 0 to 0.9 person-year in the antibiotic group against 0.8 to 3.6 with placebo. The RR of having one microbiological recurrence (MR) was 0.21 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.34), favouring antibiotic and the NNT was 1.85. For clinical recurrences (CRPY) the RR was 0.15 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.28). The NNT was 1.85. The RR of having one MR after prophylaxis was 0.82 (95% CI 0.44 to 1.53). The RR for severe side effects was 1.58 (95% CI 0.47 to 5.28) and for other side effects the RR was 1.78 (CI 1.06 to 3.00) favouring placebo. Side effects included vaginal and oral candidiasis and gastrointestinal symptoms. Antibiotic versus antibiotic (eight trials, 513 women): These trials were not pooled. Weekly pefloxacin was more effective than monthly. The RR for MR was 0.31(95% CI 0.19 to 0.52). There was no significant difference in MR between continuous daily and postcoital ciprofloxacin.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Continuous antibiotic prophylaxis for 6-12 months reduced the rate of UTI during prophylaxis when compared to placebo. After prophylaxis two studies showed nodifference between groups. There were more adverse events in the antibiotic group. One RCT compared postcoital versus continuous daily ciprofloxacin and found no significant difference in rates of UTIs, suggesting that postcoital treatment could be offered to woman who have UTI associated with sexual intercourse.
尿路感染(UTI)是一个常见的医疗保健问题。健康非孕女性复发性尿路感染(RUTI)被定义为在12个月期间发生三次或更多次尿路感染。长期使用抗生素已被提议作为预防RUTI的一种策略。
确定用于预防成年非孕女性单纯性RUTI的预防性抗生素的疗效(治疗期间及之后)和安全性。
我们检索了MEDLINE(1966年 - 2004年4月)、EMBASE(1980年 - 2003年1月)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(Cochrane图书馆2004年第1期)以及检索到文章的参考文献列表。
任何已发表的将抗生素用作RUTI预防性治疗的随机对照试验。
两名评价员独立评估试验质量并提取数据。使用随机效应模型进行统计分析,结果以相对风险(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)表示。
19项涉及1120名女性的研究符合纳入标准。抗生素与抗生素对比(10项试验,430名女性):在积极预防期间,抗生素组微生物学复发患者年率(MRPY)范围为0至0.9人年,而安慰剂组为0.8至3.6人年。发生一次微生物学复发(MR)的RR为0.21(95%CI 0.13至0.34),支持抗生素,需治疗人数(NNT)为1.85。对于临床复发(CRPY),RR为0.15(95%CI 0.08至0.28),NNT为1.85。预防后发生一次MR的RR为0.82(95%CI 0.44至1.53)。严重副作用的RR为1.58(95%CI 0.47至5.28),其他副作用的RR为1.78(CI 1.06至3.00),支持安慰剂。副作用包括阴道和口腔念珠菌病以及胃肠道症状。抗生素与抗生素对比(8项试验,513名女性):这些试验未进行合并分析。每周使用培氟沙星比每月使用更有效。MR的RR为0.31(95%CI 0.19至0.52)。连续每日使用环丙沙星与性交后使用环丙沙星在MR方面无显著差异。
与安慰剂相比,连续使用抗生素预防6 - 12个月可降低预防期间的UTI发生率。预防后两项研究显示两组之间无差异。抗生素组有更多不良事件。一项随机对照试验比较了性交后与连续每日使用环丙沙星,发现UTI发生率无显著差异,这表明对于与性交相关的UTI女性可采用性交后治疗。