Homma K, Hayashi K, Kanda T, Yoshioka K, Takamatsu I, Tatematsu S, Kumagai H, Wakino S, Saruta T
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Hum Hypertens. 2004 Dec;18(12):879-84. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001761.
Although multiple antihypertensive agents are required to control blood pressure (BP) in chronic renal disease, it remains undetermined whether the combination therapy with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) plus calcium antagonists or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) confers more preferable action on renal disease than the ARB monotherapy. In the present study, we compared the effect of the combination therapy with ARB plus calcium antagonists/ACEI on proteinuria with that of the ARB monotherapy in chronic nondiabetic renal disease. At 1 month of the drug treatment, the candesartan monotherapy (n=19) reduced BP from 154+/-3/93+/-2 to 146+/-3/88+/-2 mmHg (P<0.05), and a similar magnitude of BP reductions was observed with the combination therapy with candesartan plus ACEI/amlodipine (from 153+/-2/95+/-2 to 144+/-2/88+/-2 mmHg, P<0.05, n=39). The depressor action of these therapies was sustained throughout the 12-month treatment. In contrast, the reduction in proteinuria was greater with the combination therapy (-52+/-3% at 12 months, n=39) than with the candesartan monotherapy (-25+/-3%, n=19), although the baseline values of proteinuria were nearly the same in the candesartan monotherapy group (1.74+/-0.22 g/day) and the combination therapy group (2.10+/-0.19 g/day, P>0.2). Of note, the proteinuria-sparing effect did not differ between the candesartan+ACEI group and the candesartan+amlodipine group. In conclusion, the present study suggests more beneficial action of the combination therapy with ARB plus ACEI/amlodipine than the ARB monotherapy in nondiabetic renal disease. Since the reduction in BP was achieved to the same level, the distinct proteinuria-sparing action of these therapies is attributed to BP-independent mechanisms, which should vary depending on the agents used.
虽然在慢性肾病中需要多种抗高血压药物来控制血压(BP),但与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)单药治疗相比,ARB联合钙拮抗剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)的联合治疗对肾病是否具有更优作用仍未确定。在本研究中,我们比较了ARB联合钙拮抗剂/ACEI的联合治疗与ARB单药治疗对慢性非糖尿病肾病蛋白尿的影响。在药物治疗1个月时,坎地沙坦单药治疗组(n = 19)的血压从154±3/93±2降至146±3/88±2 mmHg(P<0.05),坎地沙坦联合ACEI/氨氯地平的联合治疗组也观察到类似程度的血压降低(从153±2/95±2降至144±2/88±2 mmHg,P<0.05,n = 39)。这些治疗的降压作用在整个12个月的治疗过程中持续存在。相比之下,联合治疗组的蛋白尿减少幅度更大(12个月时为-52±3%,n = 39),高于坎地沙坦单药治疗组(-25±3%,n = 19),尽管坎地沙坦单药治疗组(1.74±0.22 g/天)和联合治疗组(2.10±0.19 g/天,P>0.2)的蛋白尿基线值几乎相同。值得注意的是,坎地沙坦+ACEI组和坎地沙坦+氨氯地平组之间的蛋白尿保护作用没有差异。总之,本研究表明,在非糖尿病肾病中,ARB联合ACEI/氨氯地平的联合治疗比ARB单药治疗具有更有益的作用。由于血压降低到了相同水平,这些治疗明显的蛋白尿保护作用归因于不依赖血压的机制,而这可能因所用药物而异。