Kaminsky S B, Clark C R, Traynelis V C
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52246, USA.
Iowa Orthop J. 2004;24:95-105.
The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy is frequently one of slow, progressive neurological deterioration. The operative treatment for patients with moderate to severe involvement is decompression of the spinal cord. Laminectomy has been a traditional approach and laminoplasty has developed as an attractive alternative. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the outcomes of these two procedures in similar groups of patients at a five year average follow-up.
A consecutive series of twenty patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty for multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy or radiculopathy was compared to a similar group of 22 matched patients who underwent multi-level laminectomies. Patients were similar in age, gender, number of operative levels, and length of follow-up. At the latest examination, each patient underwent a comprehensive neurological evaluation. A modification of the Nurick classification was used to assess the degree of myelopathy. Radiographs at latest follow-up were assessed for instability, and measurements of the space-available-for-the-cord and Pavlov ratio were made at involved levels.
Myelopathy, as determined by our modified Nurick scale, improved from a preoperative average of 2.44 to 1.48 in laminoplasty patients and from an average of 3.09 to 2.50 in laminectomy patients. Pain improved 57 percent and 8 percent in laminoplasty and laminectomy groups, respectively. Subjective neck stiffness was not significantly different based on the numbers available, although laminoplasty patients demonstrated some loss of range of motion on examination. The only variable that predicted the postoperative degree of myelopathy in both groups was the preoperative degree of myelopathy.
Laminectomy and laminoplasty patients demonstrated improvements in gait, strength, sensation, pain, and degree of myelopathy. Laminoplasty was associated with fewer late complications. Based on this analysis, we believe that laminoplasty is an effective alternative to laminectomy in patients with multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy or radiculopathy.
脊髓型颈椎病的自然病程通常是缓慢的、进行性神经功能恶化。对于中重度受累患者的手术治疗是脊髓减压。椎板切除术一直是传统方法,而椎板成形术已发展成为一种有吸引力的替代方法。本研究的目的是在平均五年的随访中,检查和比较这两种手术在相似患者群体中的结果。
将连续20例因多节段脊髓型颈椎病或神经根病接受开门式椎板成形术的患者,与22例匹配的接受多节段椎板切除术的类似患者组进行比较。患者在年龄、性别、手术节段数量和随访时间方面相似。在最近一次检查时,每位患者都接受了全面的神经学评估。采用改良的努里克分类法评估脊髓病的程度。在最近一次随访时评估X线片的稳定性,并在受累节段测量脊髓可用空间和帕夫洛夫比值。
根据我们改良的努里克量表,椎板成形术患者的脊髓病从术前平均2.44改善到1.48,椎板切除术患者从平均3.09改善到2.50。椎板成形术组和椎板切除术组的疼痛分别改善了57%和8%。根据现有数据,主观颈部僵硬没有显著差异,尽管椎板成形术患者在检查时显示出一些活动范围的丧失。两组中预测术后脊髓病程度的唯一变量是术前脊髓病程度。
椎板切除术和椎板成形术患者在步态、力量、感觉、疼痛和脊髓病程度方面均有改善。椎板成形术的晚期并发症较少。基于此分析,我们认为椎板成形术是多节段脊髓型颈椎病或神经根病患者椎板切除术的有效替代方法。