Carey J C
Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1992 Feb;39(1):25-53. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38261-x.
A new model for care of children with genetic disorders has emerged from the pediatric and genetic communities in the last decade. This strategy incorporates the basic principles of well-child care, including ongoing psychological support for families, health screening, and prevention, into health supervision visits for children with these conditions. The same types of guidelines that have been developed for well children can also be applied to the routine follow-up and screening of children with these special health care needs. A number of general issues are applicable in the discussion of health supervision guidelines: correct diagnosis, analysis of the natural history of the condition, critical review of screening modalities and interventions, ongoing psychological support, and genetic counseling. With these points in mind and after a thorough review of the natural history of a disorder, guidelines can be developed and often applied to the primary care setting. Down syndrome is an ideal condition to which one can apply such a model because most children are cared for by primary care pediatricians, and the natural history is relatively well studied. Discussion of health provision in Down syndrome brings out some of the controversies regarding routine screening and review of interventions. Discussion of the natural history and uncertainties evident in the care of infants with trisomy 18 exemplifies the important issue of ongoing psychological support. Review of the natural history of neurofibromatosis emphasizes all of the principles involved in providing this model as a framework for health supervision. One of the key identified but unresolved issues is the decision as to when a primary care pediatrician can orchestrate the care on his or her own versus referral to a multidisciplinary team of specialists. In some conditions such as Down syndrome, it seems obvious that the primary care pediatrician can manage most of the care with periodic and appropriate referral to the necessary specialists. On the other hand, children with cystic fibrosis, meningomyelocele, and craniofacial syndromes almost always need referral to the specialist team because of the rarity of the disorder and the complex number of specialists involved in management. A condition such as NF-1 falls somewhere in between. Most children can be cared for in their childhood years by the pediatrician with referral when a symptom or sign emerges, but others would argue that all children with NF-1 need to be seen by a multidisciplinary team.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在过去十年中,儿科和遗传学领域出现了一种针对患有遗传疾病儿童的新型护理模式。该策略将健康儿童护理的基本原则,包括为家庭提供持续的心理支持、健康筛查和预防,纳入到对这些疾病患儿的健康监督访视中。为健康儿童制定的相同类型的指南也可应用于有这些特殊医疗需求儿童的常规随访和筛查。在讨论健康监督指南时,有一些一般性问题是适用的:正确诊断、对病情自然史的分析、对筛查方式和干预措施的批判性审查、持续的心理支持以及遗传咨询。牢记这些要点并对一种疾病的自然史进行全面审查后,就可以制定指南并常常将其应用于初级保健环境。唐氏综合征是一种可以应用这种模式的理想疾病,因为大多数患儿由初级保健儿科医生护理,且其自然史研究得相对充分。关于唐氏综合征健康护理的讨论揭示了一些关于常规筛查和干预措施审查的争议。对18三体综合征患儿护理中明显的自然史和不确定性的讨论例证了持续心理支持这一重要问题。对神经纤维瘤病自然史的审查强调了将此模式作为健康监督框架所涉及的所有原则。一个已确定但尚未解决的关键问题是,决定初级保健儿科医生何时能够自行协调护理,何时应转诊至多学科专家团队。在某些疾病如唐氏综合征中,初级保健儿科医生显然可以管理大部分护理工作,并定期适当地转诊至必要的专家处。另一方面,患有囊性纤维化、脊髓脊膜膨出和颅面综合征的儿童几乎总是需要转诊至专家团队,因为这些疾病罕见且管理涉及的专家众多。像1型神经纤维瘤病这样的疾病则介于两者之间。大多数患儿在童年时期可由儿科医生护理,出现症状或体征时转诊,但也有人认为所有1型神经纤维瘤病患儿都需要由多学科团队诊治。(摘要截选至400字)