Smolders R, Bervoets L, Blust R
Laboratory for Ecophysiology, Biochemistry and Toxicology, University of Antwerp (RUCA), Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
Environ Pollut. 2004 Nov;132(2):231-43. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.04.019.
Effluents are a main source of direct and often continuous input of pollutants into aquatic ecosystems with long-term implications on ecosystem functioning. Therefore, the study of the effects of effluent exposure on organisms, populations or communities within the framework of impact assessment has a high ecological relevance. The aim of this study was to assess the toxicological impact of two effluents, one household wastewater treatment effluent (Effluent 1) and one industrial effluent (Effluent 2), on the receiving aquatic ecosystem using two test species under both in situ and laboratory conditions. Zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) were exposed under laboratory conditions in an online monitoring flow-through system (receiving different concentrations of Effluent 2) and under in situ conditions along the pollution gradient established by these two effluent discharges. Bioassays focussed on growth and condition related endpoints (i.e. condition, growth, lipid budget), since these are key functional processes within organisms and populations. Under laboratory conditions, increasing concentrations of the industrial effluent (Effluent 2) had a negative effect on both zebra mussel and carp energy reserves and condition. Under in situ conditions, the same negative impact of Effluent 2 was observed for zebra mussels, while Effluent 1 had no apparent effect on exposed zebra mussels. Carp growth and condition, on the other hand, were significantly increased at the discharge sites of both effluents when compared to the reference site, probably due to differences in food availability. The results indicate that a combination of in situ and laboratory exposures can illustrate how ecological processes influence bioassay studies. The incorporation of indirect, ecological effects, like changes in food availability, provides considerable benefit in understanding and predicting effects of effluents on selected species under realistic exposure conditions.
废水是污染物直接且常常持续输入水生生态系统的主要来源,对生态系统功能具有长期影响。因此,在影响评估框架内研究废水暴露对生物、种群或群落的影响具有高度的生态相关性。本研究的目的是在原位和实验室条件下,使用两种受试物种评估两种废水,一种生活污水处理废水(废水1)和一种工业废水(废水2)对受纳水生生态系统的毒理学影响。斑马贻贝(多形饰贝)和鲤鱼在实验室条件下,于在线监测流通系统(接受不同浓度的废水2)中暴露,并在原位条件下沿着这两种废水排放所建立的污染梯度暴露。生物测定聚焦于与生长和状况相关的终点指标(即状况、生长、脂质平衡),因为这些是生物和种群内的关键功能过程。在实验室条件下,工业废水(废水2)浓度增加对斑马贻贝和鲤鱼的能量储备及状况均产生负面影响。在原位条件下,观察到废水2对斑马贻贝有同样的负面影响,而废水1对暴露的斑马贻贝没有明显影响。另一方面,与参考位点相比,两种废水排放位点的鲤鱼生长和状况均显著增加,这可能是由于食物可利用性的差异。结果表明,原位和实验室暴露相结合可以说明生态过程如何影响生物测定研究。纳入间接的生态效应,如食物可利用性的变化,在理解和预测现实暴露条件下废水对选定物种的影响方面提供了相当大的帮助。