• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of unintentional fatal occupational injuries in the Republic of Korea and the United States.大韩民国与美国非故意致命职业伤害的比较。
Inj Prev. 2004 Aug;10(4):199-205. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.004895.
2
The effect of rate denominator source on US fatal occupational injury rate estimates.比率分母来源对美国致命职业伤害率估计值的影响。
Am J Ind Med. 2004 Sep;46(3):261-70. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20057.
3
Comparison of fatal occupational injury surveillance systems between the European Union and the United States.欧盟与美国致命职业伤害监测系统的比较。
Am J Ind Med. 2003 Oct;44(4):385-91. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10290.
4
Fatal work-related farm injuries in Canada, 1991-1995. Canadian Agricultural Injury Surveillance Program.1991 - 1995年加拿大与工作相关的致命农场伤害。加拿大农业伤害监测项目。
CMAJ. 1999 Jun 29;160(13):1843-8.
5
Fatal occupational injuries in Taiwan, 1994-2005.1994-2005 年台湾致命职业伤害。
Occup Environ Med. 2010 Apr;67(4):251-5. doi: 10.1136/oem.2009.047407. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
6
Effects of data limitations when modeling fatal occupational injury rates.对致命职业伤害率进行建模时数据限制的影响。
Am J Ind Med. 2004 Sep;46(3):271-83. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20070.
7
Occupational injury mortality surveillance in the United States: an examination of census counts from two different surveillance systems, 1992-1997.美国职业伤害死亡率监测:对1992 - 1997年两个不同监测系统人口普查计数的检查
Am J Ind Med. 2004 Jan;45(1):1-13. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10308.
8
Deindustrialisation and the long term decline in fatal occupational injuries.去工业化与致命职业伤害的长期下降
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Jul;61(7):616-21. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.009571.
9
Surveillance of traumatic occupational fatalities in Alaska--implications for prevention.阿拉斯加创伤性职业死亡监测——对预防工作的启示
Public Health Rep. 1992 Jan-Feb;107(1):70-4.
10
Occupational injury fatalities--1994.职业伤害死亡人数——1994年
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1996 Apr-Jun;77(2):12-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Fatal occupational injuries in North Carolina, 1992-2017.1992-2017 年北卡罗来纳州致命职业伤害。
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Nov 23;80(12):680-686. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109050.
2
Work-related disease symptoms and occupational injuries among coffee processing industry workers in Bench-Sheko and Kaffa Zones Southwest, Ethiopia: A mixed-method study.埃塞俄比亚本尚谢科和咖法西南地区咖啡加工行业工人的与工作相关的疾病症状和职业伤害:一项混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;10:1034957. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1034957. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparative Analysis of the National Fatality Rate in Construction Industry Using Time-Series Approach and Equivalent Evaluation Conditions.基于时间序列方法和等效评估条件的建筑业国家死亡率比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 17;19(4):2312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042312.
4
Increased risk of suicide after occupational injury in Korea.韩国研究称职业伤害后自杀风险增加
Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jan;78(1):43-45. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106687. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Work-related injuries resulting in death in Chile: a cross-sectional study on 2014 and 2015 registries.智利因工作导致的死亡事故:2014 年和 2015 年登记册的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 9;8(6):e020393. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020393.
6
Compensation for occupational injuries and diseases in special populations: farmers and soldiers.特殊人群(农民和军人)的职业伤病补偿
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jun;29 Suppl(Suppl):S24-31. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.S.S24. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
7
Fatal occupational injuries among non-governmental employees in Malaysia.马来西亚非政府雇员的致命职业伤害。
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Jan;56(1):65-76. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22056. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
8
Determinants of Occupational Injury: A Case Control Study among Textile Factory Workers in Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia.职业伤害的决定因素:埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区纺织厂工人的病例对照研究。
J Trop Med. 2011;2011:657275. doi: 10.1155/2011/657275. Epub 2011 Dec 11.
9
Work Related Injuries in an Oil field in Oman.阿曼某油田的工伤情况
Oman Med J. 2011 Sep;26(5):315-8. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.79.
10
Occupational injuries in a commune in rural Vietnam transitioning from agriculture to new industries.越南农村公社从农业向新产业转型过程中的职业伤害。
Am J Public Health. 2011 May;101(5):854-60. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300019.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the classification of work-relatedness of fatal incidents: a comparison between Australia, New Zealand and the United States.评估致命事故与工作相关性的分类:澳大利亚、新西兰和美国之间的比较。
Inj Control Saf Promot. 2002 Mar;9(1):32-9. doi: 10.1076/icsp.9.1.32.3321.
2
Use of narrative analysis for comparisons of the causes of fatal accidents in three countries: New Zealand, Australia, and the United States.运用叙事分析比较新西兰、澳大利亚和美国三个国家致命事故的原因。
Inj Prev. 2001 Sep;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i15-20. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.suppl_1.i15.
3
Global estimates of fatal occupational accidents.全球致命职业事故的估计数。
Epidemiology. 1999 Sep;10(5):640-6.
4
Denominator choice in the calculation of workplace fatality rates.工作场所死亡率计算中的分母选择。
Am J Ind Med. 1998 Feb;33(2):151-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199802)33:2<151::aid-ajim6>3.0.co;2-0.
5
International comparisons of injury mortality in the elderly: issues and differences between New Zealand and the United States.老年人伤害死亡率的国际比较:新西兰与美国之间的问题及差异
Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb;24(1):136-43. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.1.136.

大韩民国与美国非故意致命职业伤害的比较。

Comparison of unintentional fatal occupational injuries in the Republic of Korea and the United States.

作者信息

Ahn Y-S, Bena J F, Bailer A J

机构信息

Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Incheon, Korea.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2004 Aug;10(4):199-205. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.004895.

DOI:10.1136/ip.2003.004895
PMID:15314045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1730127/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the profile of unintentional fatal occupational injuries in the Republic of Korea and the United States to help establish prevention strategies for Korea and to understand country specific differences in fatality risks in different industries.

METHODS

Occupational fatal injury data from 1998-2001 were collected from Korea's Occupational Safety and Health Agency's Survey of Causes of Occupational Injuries (identified by the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation) and from the United States Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. Employment estimates were obtained in both countries. Industry coding and external cause of death coding were standardized. Descriptive analyses of injury rates and Poisson regression models to examine time trends were conducted.

RESULTS

Korea exhibited a significantly higher fatal injury rate, at least two times higher than the United States, after accounting for different employment patterns. The ordering of industries with respect to risk is the same in the two countries, with mining, agriculture/forestry/fishing, and construction being the most dangerous. Fatal injury rates are decreasing in these two countries, although at a faster rate in Korea.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding industrial practices within different countries is critical for fully understanding country specific occupational injury statistics. However, differences in surveillance systems and employment estimation methods serve as caveats to any transnational comparison, and need to be harmonized to the fullest extent possible.

摘要

目的

比较韩国和美国的非故意致命职业伤害情况,以帮助韩国制定预防策略,并了解不同行业中各国特定的死亡风险差异。

方法

从韩国职业安全与健康局的职业伤害原因调查(由韩国劳动福利公司确定)以及美国致命职业伤害普查中收集1998 - 2001年的职业致命伤害数据。在两国均获取了就业估计数据。对行业编码和死因编码进行了标准化。进行了伤害率的描述性分析以及用于检验时间趋势的泊松回归模型分析。

结果

在考虑不同就业模式后,韩国的致命伤害率显著更高,至少比美国高出两倍。两国危险行业的排序相同,采矿、农业/林业/渔业和建筑业最为危险。这两个国家的致命伤害率都在下降,不过韩国下降速度更快。

结论

了解不同国家的行业做法对于全面理解各国特定的职业伤害统计数据至关重要。然而,监测系统和就业估计方法的差异是任何跨国比较的注意事项,需要尽可能充分地进行协调。