Suppr超能文献

大韩民国与美国非故意致命职业伤害的比较。

Comparison of unintentional fatal occupational injuries in the Republic of Korea and the United States.

作者信息

Ahn Y-S, Bena J F, Bailer A J

机构信息

Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Incheon, Korea.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2004 Aug;10(4):199-205. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.004895.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the profile of unintentional fatal occupational injuries in the Republic of Korea and the United States to help establish prevention strategies for Korea and to understand country specific differences in fatality risks in different industries.

METHODS

Occupational fatal injury data from 1998-2001 were collected from Korea's Occupational Safety and Health Agency's Survey of Causes of Occupational Injuries (identified by the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation) and from the United States Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. Employment estimates were obtained in both countries. Industry coding and external cause of death coding were standardized. Descriptive analyses of injury rates and Poisson regression models to examine time trends were conducted.

RESULTS

Korea exhibited a significantly higher fatal injury rate, at least two times higher than the United States, after accounting for different employment patterns. The ordering of industries with respect to risk is the same in the two countries, with mining, agriculture/forestry/fishing, and construction being the most dangerous. Fatal injury rates are decreasing in these two countries, although at a faster rate in Korea.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding industrial practices within different countries is critical for fully understanding country specific occupational injury statistics. However, differences in surveillance systems and employment estimation methods serve as caveats to any transnational comparison, and need to be harmonized to the fullest extent possible.

摘要

目的

比较韩国和美国的非故意致命职业伤害情况,以帮助韩国制定预防策略,并了解不同行业中各国特定的死亡风险差异。

方法

从韩国职业安全与健康局的职业伤害原因调查(由韩国劳动福利公司确定)以及美国致命职业伤害普查中收集1998 - 2001年的职业致命伤害数据。在两国均获取了就业估计数据。对行业编码和死因编码进行了标准化。进行了伤害率的描述性分析以及用于检验时间趋势的泊松回归模型分析。

结果

在考虑不同就业模式后,韩国的致命伤害率显著更高,至少比美国高出两倍。两国危险行业的排序相同,采矿、农业/林业/渔业和建筑业最为危险。这两个国家的致命伤害率都在下降,不过韩国下降速度更快。

结论

了解不同国家的行业做法对于全面理解各国特定的职业伤害统计数据至关重要。然而,监测系统和就业估计方法的差异是任何跨国比较的注意事项,需要尽可能充分地进行协调。

相似文献

2
The effect of rate denominator source on US fatal occupational injury rate estimates.
Am J Ind Med. 2004 Sep;46(3):261-70. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20057.
5
Fatal occupational injuries in Taiwan, 1994-2005.
Occup Environ Med. 2010 Apr;67(4):251-5. doi: 10.1136/oem.2009.047407. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
6
Effects of data limitations when modeling fatal occupational injury rates.
Am J Ind Med. 2004 Sep;46(3):271-83. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20070.
8
Deindustrialisation and the long term decline in fatal occupational injuries.
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Jul;61(7):616-21. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.009571.
10
Occupational injury fatalities--1994.
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1996 Apr-Jun;77(2):12-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Fatal occupational injuries in North Carolina, 1992-2017.
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Nov 23;80(12):680-686. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109050.
4
Increased risk of suicide after occupational injury in Korea.
Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jan;78(1):43-45. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106687. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
6
Compensation for occupational injuries and diseases in special populations: farmers and soldiers.
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jun;29 Suppl(Suppl):S24-31. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.S.S24. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
7
Fatal occupational injuries among non-governmental employees in Malaysia.
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Jan;56(1):65-76. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22056. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
9
Work Related Injuries in an Oil field in Oman.
Oman Med J. 2011 Sep;26(5):315-8. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.79.
10
Occupational injuries in a commune in rural Vietnam transitioning from agriculture to new industries.
Am J Public Health. 2011 May;101(5):854-60. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300019.

本文引用的文献

3
Global estimates of fatal occupational accidents.
Epidemiology. 1999 Sep;10(5):640-6.
4
Denominator choice in the calculation of workplace fatality rates.
Am J Ind Med. 1998 Feb;33(2):151-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199802)33:2<151::aid-ajim6>3.0.co;2-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验