Suppr超能文献

电化学活化水作为感染牙齿模型冲洗剂的有效性。

Effectiveness of electrochemically activated water as an irrigant in an infected tooth model.

作者信息

Gulabivala K, Stock C J R, Lewsey J D, Ghori S, Ng Y-L, Spratt D A

机构信息

Unit of Endodontology, Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2004 Sep;37(9):624-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00867.x.

Abstract

AIM

To test the effectiveness of electrochemically activated aqueous solutions in the debridement of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in root canals of extracted teeth.

METHODOLOGY

Extracted, human, single-rooted teeth (198) assembled into 11 sets (n = 18) with matching anatomical characteristics were randomly assigned to eight experimental groups. After decoronation, the root canals were prepared to a standard size. Enterococcus faecalis biofilms were grown in the root canals of autoclaved, individually mounted teeth over 48 h. Electrolysed saline collected as anolyte at the anode and catholyte at the cathode were the test agents. The four ultrasonication and four without ultrasonication irrigant groups included: neutral anolyte (NA) (pH 6.5), acidic anolyte (AA) (pH 3.0), catholyte (C) (pH 11.5) and C alternated with neutral anolyte (C/NA). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with and without ultrasonication formed negative and NaOCl (3%) positive control groups. After irrigation, root canal samples were serially diluted, cultured and enumerated. The data were analysed as ratios of residual colony-forming units (CFUs) in PBS versus the test irrigants and using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

The NA and NA (ultrasonicated, U), C/NA and AA (U) groups had significantly (alpha = 0.05) less and C (U) and C/NA (U) significantly (alpha = 0.05) more bacteria (CFUs mL(-1)) compared with their respective PBS controls. Ultrasonicated C/NA had significantly (alpha = 0.05) higher CFU counts than the nonultrasonicated solution. Other comparisons between ultrasonic and nonultrasonic groups were not significant. Of the nonultrasonicated groups, C/NA and NA were most effective, whilst of the ultrasonicated groups, AA and NA were most effective. None of these was as effective as 3% NaOCl.

CONCLUSIONS

All but two groups (AA and C) were significantly different from their PBS controls. There was a significant difference between the C/NA groups with and without ultrasonication but not between other combinations. NA (U) and AA (U) were the most effective test solutions but NaOCl (3%) gave by far the highest bacterial kills.

摘要

目的

测试电化学活化水溶液对拔除牙根管内粪肠球菌生物膜的清创效果。

方法

将198颗拔除的人单根牙组装成11组(每组n = 18),根据解剖特征匹配后随机分为8个实验组。去冠后,将根管预备至标准尺寸。在经过高压灭菌、单独安装的牙齿根管内培养粪肠球菌生物膜48小时。收集在阳极作为阳极电解液和在阴极作为阴极电解液的电解盐水作为测试剂。四个超声冲洗组和四个非超声冲洗组包括:中性阳极电解液(NA)(pH 6.5)、酸性阳极电解液(AA)(pH 3.0)、阴极电解液(C)(pH 11.5)以及阴极电解液与中性阳极电解液交替使用(C/NA)。有无超声冲洗的磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)分别形成阴性对照组和3%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)阳性对照组。冲洗后,将根管样本进行系列稀释、培养并计数。数据以PBS中残留菌落形成单位(CFU)与测试冲洗液的比值进行分析,并使用多元回归分析。

结果

与各自的PBS对照组相比,NA和NA(超声冲洗,U)组、C/NA和AA(U)组细菌(CFU mL⁻¹)显著减少(α = 0.05),而C(U)和C/NA(U)组细菌显著增多(α = 0.05)。超声冲洗的C/NA组CFU计数显著高于未超声冲洗的溶液(α = 0.05)。超声冲洗组与非超声冲洗组之间的其他比较无显著差异。在非超声冲洗组中,C/NA和NA最有效,而在超声冲洗组中,则是AA和NA最有效。这些组均不如3% NaOCl有效。

结论

除两组(AA和C)外,所有组与各自的PBS对照组均有显著差异。超声冲洗与未超声冲洗的C/NA组之间存在显著差异,但其他组合之间无显著差异。NA(U)和AA(U)是最有效的测试溶液,但3% NaOCl的杀菌效果远高于其他溶液。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验