Keshner Emily A, Kenyon Robert V, Langston Jessica
Sensory Motor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Vestib Res. 2004;14(4):307-19.
The purpose of this study was to identify how the postural system weights coincident yet discordant disturbances of the visual and proprioceptive/vestibular systems. Eleven healthy subjects (25-38 yrs) received either fore-aft translations of an immersive, wide field-of-view visual environment (0.1 Hz, +/- 3.7 m/sec), or anterior-posterior translations of the support surface (0.25 Hz, +/- 15 cm/sec), or both concurrently. Kinematics of the head, trunk, and shank were collected with an Optotrak system and angular motion of each segment plotted across time. With only support surface translation, segmental responses were small (1 degrees -2 degrees ) and mostly opposed the direction of sled translation. When only the visual scene was moving, segmental responses increased as the trial progressed. When the inputs were presented coincidentally, response amplitudes were large even at the onset of the trial. Mean RMS values across subjects were significantly greater with combined stimuli than for either stimulus presented alone and areas under the power curve across subjects were significantly increased at the frequency of the visual input when both inputs were presented. Thus, intra-modality dependencies were observed, such that responses to the visual inputs significantly increased and responses to the somatosensory signals reflected the stimulus amplitude only when the two inputs were combined. We believe it unlikely that the role of any single pathway contributing to postural control can be accurately characterized in a static environment if the function of that pathway is context dependent.
本研究的目的是确定姿势系统如何权衡视觉与本体感觉/前庭系统中同时出现但又不一致的干扰。11名健康受试者(25 - 38岁)接受了沉浸式宽视野视觉环境的前后平移(0.1赫兹,±3.7米/秒),或支撑面的前后平移(0.25赫兹,±15厘米/秒),或两者同时进行。使用Optotrak系统收集头部、躯干和小腿的运动学数据,并绘制每个节段的角运动随时间的变化图。仅进行支撑面平移时,节段反应较小(1度 - 2度),且大多与滑板平移方向相反。仅视觉场景移动时,节段反应随着试验进行而增加。当两种输入同时呈现时,即使在试验开始时反应幅度也很大。联合刺激时受试者的平均均方根值显著大于单独呈现任何一种刺激时的值,并且当两种输入同时呈现时,受试者功率曲线下的面积在视觉输入频率处显著增加。因此,观察到了模态内依赖性,即仅当两种输入组合时,对视觉输入的反应才会显著增加,而对体感信号的反应仅反映刺激幅度。我们认为,如果任何单一通路对姿势控制的作用取决于上下文,那么在静态环境中就不太可能准确地描述该通路的功能。