Ewing Gail, Rogers Margaret, Barclay Stephen, McCabe Janet, Martin Anna, Todd Chris
Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Palliat Med. 2004 Jul;18(5):452-9. doi: 10.1191/0269216304pm905oa.
In the UK, researchers' access to study populations and control over selection of participants is becoming increasingly constrained by data protection and research governance legislation. Intervening stages placed between researchers and the population they wish to study can have serious effects on recruitment and ultimately on the validity of studies. In this paper we describe our experiences of gaining access to patients for a study of palliative care in primary care. Despite considerable time and resources dedicated to recruitment, a smaller than anticipated study sample was achieved. We found that gatekeeping by ethics committees and practitioner control over sample selection were significant hurdles in accessing patients for the study. Gatekeeping responsibilities represent considerable challenges for researchers seeking to obtain a representative study sample, not just in palliative care, but for research in general in health care.
在英国,研究人员接触研究人群以及对参与者选择的控制正日益受到数据保护和研究治理法规的限制。研究人员与其希望研究的人群之间设置的中间环节可能会对招募产生严重影响,并最终影响研究的有效性。在本文中,我们描述了在一项初级保健中姑息治疗研究中接触患者的经历。尽管投入了大量时间和资源进行招募,但获得的研究样本比预期的要小。我们发现,伦理委员会的把关以及从业者对样本选择的控制是该研究接触患者的重大障碍。把关责任对寻求获得具有代表性研究样本的研究人员来说是相当大的挑战,不仅在姑息治疗领域如此,在医疗保健的一般研究中也是如此。