Chen Wen-Jer, Lai Po-Liang, Tai Ching-Lung, Chen Lih-Huei, Niu Chi-Chien
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5 Fu-Hsing St., Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004 Oct;19(8):763-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.05.010.
The mechanisms and changes in range of motion of neighboring mobile segment (adjacent level) after the instrumented posterior stabilization are not completely understood. This study aims to investigate the effect of sagittal alignment on the adjacent joint mobility after lumbar instrumentation.
Eight fresh porcine lumbar spines were instrumented with pedicle screw implants from L2 to L4. Each specimen was tested in three different sagittal alignments. Group A were instrumented in lordotic alignment (lordosis 20 degrees ), Group B in straight alignment (lordosis 0 degrees ), and Group C in kyphotic alignment (kyphosis 20 degrees ). Hydraulic testing machine was used to generate an increasing moment in flexion and extension respectively for each specimen. The vertebral displacement of the disc between L1-L2 and L4-L5 were measured simultaneously with an extensometer.
There were no significant differences in vertebral displacement between the three different sagittal alignments in both the superior and inferior adjacent segments under extension motion. However, under flexion motion, the vertebral displacement on the superior adjacent segment (L1-L2) with kyphotic alignment was statistically larger than that of the straight and lordotic alignments (P = 0.0198 and P = 0.000473 respectively), and no differences were found between the three different sagittal alignments on the inferior adjacent segment (L4-L5).
The iatrogenically produced kyphotic lumbar spine by posterior instrumentation might cause larger adjacent joint mobility on the superior adjacent joint as compared to the instrumented lordotic lumbar spine. This study implies that an instrumented spine in lordosis is less likely to develop adjacent instability than a kyphotic spine.
后路器械固定术后相邻活动节段(相邻节段)活动范围的机制及变化尚未完全明确。本研究旨在探讨矢状面排列对腰椎器械固定术后相邻关节活动度的影响。
对8个新鲜猪腰椎标本从L2至L4置入椎弓根螺钉植入物。每个标本在三种不同的矢状面排列下进行测试。A组以前凸排列方式固定(前凸20度),B组以直立体位排列方式固定(前凸0度),C组以后凸排列方式固定(后凸20度)。使用液压试验机分别对每个标本在屈伸过程中施加逐渐增加的力矩。同时用引伸计测量L1-L2和L4-L5椎间盘的椎体位移。
在伸展运动时,三个不同矢状面排列的上下相邻节段的椎体位移均无显著差异。然而,在屈曲运动时,后凸排列的上相邻节段(L1-L2)的椎体位移在统计学上大于直立体位和前凸排列(分别为P = 0.0198和P = 0.000473),下相邻节段(L4-L5)的三种不同矢状面排列之间未发现差异。
与器械固定的前凸腰椎相比,后路器械固定导致的医源性后凸腰椎可能在上相邻关节引起更大的相邻关节活动度。本研究表明,与后凸脊柱相比,前凸排列的器械固定脊柱发生相邻节段不稳定的可能性较小。