Ostensjø Sigrid, Carlberg Eva Brogren, Vøllestad Nina K
Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo University College, Oslo, Norway.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004 Sep;46(9):580-9. doi: 10.1017/s0012162204000994.
In this study we assessed the distribution of spasticity, range of motion (ROM) deficits, and selective motor control problems in children with cerebral palsy (CP), and examined how these impairments relate to each other and to gross motor function and everyday activities. Ninety-five children (55 males, 40 females; mean age 58 months, SD 18 months, range 25 to 87 months) were evaluated with the modified Ashworth scale (MAS), passive ROM, the Selective Motor Control scale (SMC), the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Types of CP were hemiplegia (n=19), spastic diplegia (n=40), ataxic diplegia (n=4), spastic quadriplegia (n=16), dyskinetic (n=9), and mixed type (n=7). Severity spanned all five levels of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). The findings highlight the importance of measuring spasticity and ROM in several muscles and across joints. Wide variability of correlations of MAS, ROM, and SMC indicates a complex relationship between spasticity, ROM, and selective motor control. Loss of selective control seemed to interfere with gross motor function more than the other impairments. Further analyses showed that motor impairments were only one component among many factors that could predict gross motor function and everyday activities. Accomplishment of these activities was best predicted by the child's ability to perform gross motor tasks.
在本研究中,我们评估了脑瘫(CP)患儿的痉挛分布、关节活动范围(ROM)缺陷和选择性运动控制问题,并研究了这些损伤之间以及它们与粗大运动功能和日常活动之间的关系。我们使用改良Ashworth量表(MAS)、被动ROM、选择性运动控制量表(SMC)、粗大运动功能测量(GMFM)和儿童残疾评估量表(PEDI)对95名儿童(55名男性,40名女性;平均年龄58个月,标准差18个月,范围25至87个月)进行了评估。脑瘫类型包括偏瘫(n = 19)、痉挛性双瘫(n = 40)、共济失调性双瘫(n = 4)、痉挛性四肢瘫(n = 16)、运动障碍型(n = 9)和混合型(n = 7)。严重程度涵盖了粗大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)的所有五个级别。研究结果突出了测量多个肌肉和多个关节的痉挛和ROM的重要性。MAS、ROM和SMC之间相关性的广泛变异性表明痉挛、ROM和选择性运动控制之间存在复杂的关系。选择性控制的丧失似乎比其他损伤对粗大运动功能的干扰更大。进一步分析表明,运动损伤只是众多可预测粗大运动功能和日常活动的因素之一。这些活动的完成情况最好通过儿童执行粗大运动任务的能力来预测。