Ashton D, Hilton M, Thomas K V
Environment Agency, National Centre for Ecotoxicology and Hazardous Substances, Evenlode House, Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxon, OX10 8BD, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2004 Oct 15;333(1-3):167-84. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.062.
The occurrence of 12 selected pharmaceutical compounds and pharmaceutical compound metabolites in sewage treatment works (STW) effluents and surface waters was investigated. The substances selected for the monitoring programme were identified by a risk ranking procedure to identify those substances with the greatest potential to pose a risk to the aquatic environment. STW final effluent and surface water samples were collected from Corby, Great Billing, East Hyde, Harpenden and Ryemeads STWs. Ten of the 12 pharmaceutical compounds were detected in the STW effluent samples: propranolol (100%, median = 76 ng/l), diclofenac (86%, median = 424 ng/l), ibuprofen (84%, median = 3086 ng/l), mefenamic acid (81%, median = 133 ng/l), dextropropoxyphene (74%, median = 195 ng/l), trimethoprim (65%, 70 ng/l), erythromycin (44%, < 10 ng/l), acetyl-sulfamethoxazole (33%, median =< 50 ng/l), sulfamethoxazole (9%, median =< 50 ng/l), tamoxifen (4%, median =< 10 ng/l). In the corresponding receiving streams, fewer compounds and lower concentrations were found: propranolol (87%, median = 29 ng/l), ibuprofen (69%, median = 826 ng/l), mefenamic acid (60%, median = 62 ng/l), dextropropoxyphene (53%, median = 58 ng/l), diclofenac (47%, median =< 20 ng/l), erythromycin (38%, median =< 10 ng/l), trimethoprim (38%, median =< 10 ng/l), acetyl sulfamethoxazole (38%, median =< 50 ng/l). Four human pharmaceutical compounds were detected in samples upstream of the STWs sampled: ibuprofen (57%, median = 181 ng/l), trimethoprim (36%, median < 10 ng/l), erythromycin (17%, median =< 10 ng/l), propranolol (14%, median =< 10 ng/l), suggesting that longer range stream transport of some compounds is possible. The particular STW that was sampled and the month that it was sampled significantly influenced the measured concentrations of several, but not all, substances. There was no significant relationship between usage data and the overall frequency with which different substances were detected. There was however, some evidence to suggest that usage data are positively associated with concentrations of pharmaceuticals in effluent and, particularly, with concentrations measured in surface waters below STWs. These results suggest that most sewage treatment works in England and Wales are likely to be routinely discharging small quantities of pharmaceuticals into UK rivers. None of the pharmaceuticals were found at concentrations that were high enough to cause acute toxic impacts to aquatic organisms. However, insufficient data were available to be able to comment on whether the concentrations measured have the potential to result in more subtle long-term effects on aquatic organisms (e.g. effects on growth, ability to reproduce).
对污水处理厂(STW)出水和地表水中12种选定的药物化合物及药物化合物代谢物的出现情况进行了调查。通过风险排名程序确定了监测计划中选定的物质,以识别那些对水生环境构成风险潜力最大的物质。从科比、大比林、东海德、哈彭登和雷米兹污水处理厂采集了污水处理厂最终出水和地表水样本。在污水处理厂出水样本中检测到了12种药物化合物中的10种:普萘洛尔(100%,中位数 = 76纳克/升)、双氯芬酸(86%,中位数 = 424纳克/升)、布洛芬(84%,中位数 = 3086纳克/升)、甲芬那酸(81%,中位数 = 133纳克/升)、右丙氧芬(74%,中位数 = 195纳克/升)、甲氧苄啶(65%,70纳克/升)、红霉素(44%,<10纳克/升)、乙酰磺胺甲恶唑(33%,中位数 =<50纳克/升)、磺胺甲恶唑(9%,中位数 =<50纳克/升)、他莫昔芬(4%,中位数 =<10纳克/升)。在相应的接纳溪流中,发现的化合物较少且浓度较低:普萘洛尔(87%,中位数 = 29纳克/升)、布洛芬(69%,中位数 = 826纳克/升)、甲芬那酸(60%,中位数 = 62纳克/升)、右丙氧芬(53%,中位数 = 58纳克/升)、双氯芬酸(47%,中位数 =<20纳克/升)、红霉素(38%,中位数 =<10纳克/升)、甲氧苄啶(38%,中位数 =<10纳克/升)、乙酰磺胺甲恶唑(38%,中位数 =<50纳克/升)。在采样的污水处理厂上游的样本中检测到了四种人类药物化合物:布洛芬(57%,中位数 = 181纳克/升)、甲氧苄啶(36%,中位数 < 10纳克/升)、红霉素(17%,中位数 =<10纳克/升)、普萘洛尔(14%,中位数 =<10纳克/升),这表明某些化合物有可能进行更长距离的溪流输送。所采样的特定污水处理厂及其采样月份对几种(但不是全部)物质的测量浓度有显著影响。使用数据与不同物质被检测到的总体频率之间没有显著关系。然而,有一些证据表明,使用数据与污水中药物的浓度呈正相关,特别是与污水处理厂下游地表水中测量的浓度呈正相关。这些结果表明,英格兰和威尔士的大多数污水处理厂可能经常向英国河流中排放少量药物。未发现任何药物的浓度高到足以对水生生物造成急性毒性影响。然而,没有足够的数据来评论所测量的浓度是否有可能对水生生物产生更微妙的长期影响(例如对生长、繁殖能力的影响)。