Glenner Henrik, Hansen Anders J, Sørensen Martin V, Ronquist Frederik, Huelsenbeck John P, Willerslev Eske
Department of Evolutionary Biology, Biological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Curr Biol. 2004 Sep 21;14(18):1644-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.027.
Metazoan phylogeny remains one of evolutionary biology's major unsolved problems. Molecular and morphological data, as well as different analytical approaches, have produced highly conflicting results due to homoplasy resulting from more than 570 million years of evolution. To date, parsimony has been the only feasible combined approach but is highly sensitive to long-branch attraction. Recent development of stochastic models for discrete morphological characters and computationally efficient methods for Bayesian inference has enabled combined molecular and morphological data analysis with rigorous statistical approaches less prone to such inconsistencies. We present the first statistically founded analysis of a metazoan data set based on a combination of morphological and molecular data and compare the results with a traditional parsimony analysis. Interestingly, the Bayesian analyses demonstrate a high degree of congruence between morphological and molecular data, and both data sets contribute to the result of the combined analysis. Additionally, they resolve several irregularities obtained in previous studies and show high credibility values for controversial groups such as the ecdysozoans and lophotrochozoans. Parsimony, on the contrary, shows conflicting results, with morphology being congruent to the Bayesian results and the molecular data set producing peculiarities that are largely reflected in the combined analysis.
后生动物系统发育仍然是进化生物学中主要未解决的问题之一。由于超过5.7亿年的进化导致的趋同现象,分子和形态学数据以及不同的分析方法产生了高度冲突的结果。迄今为止,简约法一直是唯一可行的综合方法,但对长枝吸引高度敏感。离散形态特征随机模型和贝叶斯推断的高效计算方法的最新发展,使得能够采用不太容易出现此类不一致的严格统计方法对分子和形态学数据进行联合分析。我们基于形态学和分子数据的组合,首次对后生动物数据集进行了有统计学依据的分析,并将结果与传统简约分析进行了比较。有趣的是,贝叶斯分析表明形态学和分子数据之间具有高度一致性,并且两个数据集都对联合分析的结果有贡献。此外,它们解决了先前研究中获得的几个不规则问题,并为有争议的类群(如蜕皮动物和冠轮动物)显示出高可信度值。相反,简约法显示出相互矛盾的结果,形态学与贝叶斯结果一致,而分子数据集产生的特殊性在很大程度上反映在联合分析中。