Suppr超能文献

增强老年患者的自主权?一项旨在增加预立医疗指示讨论与使用的随机对照试验。

Empowerment of the older patient? A randomized, controlled trial to increase discussion and use of advance directives.

作者信息

Sachs G A, Stocking C B, Miles S H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Mar;40(3):269-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb02081.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To see if an educational intervention directed at older outpatients would lead to increased use or discussion of advance directives and to characterize patients' reasons for not obtaining advance directives.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial of an educational intervention versus usual care.

SETTING

Outpatient geriatrics clinic of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred and thirty-one non-demented patients over the age of 65 who did not have an advance directive documented in their record at the start of the study. Forty-eight patients were in the trial arm and 83 in the control.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All patients had their charts reexamined 6 months after enrollment to look for the presence of a living will, a durable power of attorney for health care, or a physician's note describing a discussion of advance directives. Trial patients were also re-interviewed to examine their reasons for not executing an advance directive.

MAIN RESULTS

Six months after the intervention, only seven of the 48 trial subjects (15%) had an advance directive or note describing discussion of advance directives in their charts compared to eight of the 83 controls (10%) (P greater than 0.05). When asked to give reasons for not obtaining an advance directive, many patients' responses pointed to procrastination as a significant barrier.

CONCLUSIONS

Promoting advance directive use is a complicated task. Barriers other than information and access to documents appear to be involved and need to be addressed in future efforts.

摘要

目的

探讨针对老年门诊患者的教育干预措施是否会促使预立医疗指示的使用或讨论增加,并明确患者未获取预立医疗指示的原因。

设计

教育干预与常规护理的随机对照试验。

地点

大学医院的门诊老年病诊所。

患者

131名65岁以上的非痴呆患者,研究开始时其病历中未记录有预立医疗指示。48名患者进入试验组,83名患者进入对照组。

主要观察指标

所有患者在入组6个月后重新检查病历,以查找是否存在生前遗嘱、医疗保健持久授权书或描述预立医疗指示讨论情况的医生记录。还对试验组患者进行再次访谈,以探究他们未签署预立医疗指示的原因。

主要结果

干预6个月后,48名试验对象中只有7人(15%)的病历中有预立医疗指示或描述预立医疗指示讨论情况的记录,而83名对照组患者中有8人(10%)(P>0.05)。当被问及未获取预立医疗指示的原因时,许多患者的回答指出拖延是一个重要障碍。

结论

推广预立医疗指示的使用是一项复杂的任务。除了信息和获取文件方面的障碍外,似乎还存在其他障碍,未来的工作需要加以解决。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验