Suppr超能文献

一种源自人种志的焦虑、抑郁和躯体化测量工具:范氏越南精神病量表。

An ethnographically derived measure of anxiety, depression and somatization: the Phan Vietnamese Psychiatric Scale.

作者信息

Phan Tuong, Steel Zachary, Silove Derrick

机构信息

School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.

出版信息

Transcult Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;41(2):200-32. doi: 10.1177/1363461504043565.

Abstract

This article describes the development and validation of the Phan Vietnamese Psychiatric Scale (PVPS). The PVPS was derived from Vietnamese idioms and cultural understandings of psychiatric and emotional distress identified from the Vietnamese literature and using ethnographic methods. The PVPS consists of a 26-item depression subscale, a 13-item anxiety subscale and a 14-item somatization subscale. Estimates of internal consistency for the three subscales ranged from .87 to .95, with 4-day interval test-retest reliability ranging from .81 to .89. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the subscale structure, with the depression subscale comprising two components 'general mood disturbance' and 'psychovegetative symptoms.' Multitrait-multimeasure analysis supported the construct validity of the scale. The PVPS demonstrated good criterion validity against case assignments by psychiatrists, naturalist healers, and structured diagnostic measures. The PVPS was rated as superior in clinical sensitivity and acceptability in comparison to other related measures.

摘要

本文介绍了越南版范氏精神科量表(PVPS)的开发与验证过程。PVPS源自越南习语以及从越南文献中识别出的对精神和情绪困扰的文化理解,并采用了人种学方法。PVPS包括一个由26个项目组成的抑郁分量表、一个由13个项目组成的焦虑分量表和一个由14个项目组成的躯体化分量表。三个分量表的内部一致性估计值在0.87至0.95之间,4天间隔的重测信度在0.81至0.89之间。验证性因素分析支持了分量表结构,其中抑郁分量表包括“一般情绪障碍”和“精神植物神经症状”两个成分。多特质多方法分析支持了该量表的结构效度。与精神科医生、自然疗法治疗师的病例诊断以及结构化诊断措施相比,PVPS显示出良好的效标效度。与其他相关测量工具相比,PVPS在临床敏感性和可接受性方面被评为更优。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验