Bougerol T, Uchida C, Gachoud J P, Köhler M, Mikkelsen H
Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie d'Adultes, Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, France.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992;106 Suppl:S102-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02246249.
The efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide and fluvoxamine, two new types of antidepressant agents, were compared in a multicentre, double-blind prospective study of patients with a diagnosis of major depressive episode (DSM III). Patients were randomized to receive either moclobemide (150 mg) or fluvoxamine (50 mg) twice daily for 7 days, immediately following a washout period of at least 1 week. Dosages were increased where necessary on day 8, to a maximum of moclobemide 450 mg or fluvoxamine 200 mg and in most cases were maintained at these levels for the remainder of the study period (4-6 weeks). Both treatment groups showed a marked antidepressant effect. While both treatments were well tolerated, moclobemide showed a more favourable side-effect profile than fluvoxamine. Of the 126 patients eligible for evaluation, 34 withdrew from therapy, 22% in the moclobemide group and 30% in the fluvoxamine group. Adverse events were reported in 41.8% of patients treated with moclobemide compared to 60.3% of patients in the fluvoxamine group. Reports of dry mouth and other anticholinergic effects were more frequent among those treated with fluvoxamine. A greater number of gastrointestinal complaints, especially nausea, also occurred in the fluvoxamine-treated patients.
在一项针对确诊为重度抑郁发作(DSM-III)患者的多中心、双盲前瞻性研究中,比较了两种新型抗抑郁药吗氯贝胺和氟伏沙明的疗效及耐受性。在至少1周的洗脱期后,患者被随机分为两组,一组每日两次服用吗氯贝胺(150毫克),另一组每日两次服用氟伏沙明(50毫克),持续7天。在第8天,必要时增加剂量,吗氯贝胺最大剂量为450毫克,氟伏沙明最大剂量为200毫克,在大多数情况下,在研究期的剩余时间(4-6周)维持在这些水平。两个治疗组均显示出显著的抗抑郁效果。虽然两种治疗的耐受性都良好,但吗氯贝胺的副作用比氟伏沙明更有利。在126名符合评估条件的患者中,34人退出治疗,吗氯贝胺组为22%,氟伏沙明组为30%。服用吗氯贝胺的患者中有41.8%报告了不良事件,而氟伏沙明组为60.3%。服用氟伏沙明的患者中口干和其他抗胆碱能作用的报告更为频繁。氟伏沙明治疗的患者中胃肠道不适,尤其是恶心的情况也更多。