• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工耳蜗跨中心阈值变化:与言语识别的关系

Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition.

作者信息

Pfingst Bryan E, Xu Li, Thompson Catherine S

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Nov-Dec;9(6):341-52. doi: 10.1159/000081283. Epub 2004 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1159/000081283
PMID:15467287
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1450110/
Abstract

Functional implications of across-site variation in detection thresholds in subjects with cochlear implants were evaluated by comparing thresholds to speech recognition performance. Detection thresholds for bipolar (BP) and monopolar (MP) stimulation of all available stimulation sites were assessed in 21 subjects with Nucleus CI24M and CI24R(CS) implants. We found significant negative correlations between speech recognition and within-subject across-site threshold variance for both BP and MP stimulation, but no significant correlation of speech recognition with mean threshold levels. These results suggest that across-site variance of detection thresholds could provide a useful early indication of the prognosis for speech recognition and might serve as an indicator for specific therapeutic approaches in individual subjects.

摘要

通过比较阈值与言语识别性能,评估了人工耳蜗植入受试者检测阈值的跨部位差异的功能影响。对21名植入Nucleus CI24M和CI24R(CS)人工耳蜗的受试者,评估了所有可用刺激部位的双极(BP)和单极(MP)刺激的检测阈值。我们发现,对于BP和MP刺激,言语识别与受试者内跨部位阈值方差之间存在显著的负相关,但言语识别与平均阈值水平之间无显著相关性。这些结果表明,检测阈值的跨部位差异可为言语识别预后提供有用的早期指标,并可能作为个体受试者特定治疗方法的指标。

相似文献

1
Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition.人工耳蜗跨中心阈值变化:与言语识别的关系
Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Nov-Dec;9(6):341-52. doi: 10.1159/000081283. Epub 2004 Oct 1.
2
Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.人工耳蜗检测阈值和最大舒适响度水平的跨中心差异。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Mar;5(1):11-24. doi: 10.1007/s10162-003-3051-0. Epub 2003 Nov 20.
3
Psychophysical metrics and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.人工耳蜗使用者的心理物理学指标与言语识别
Audiol Neurootol. 2005 Nov-Dec;10(6):331-41. doi: 10.1159/000087350. Epub 2005 Aug 5.
4
Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.单极检测阈值可预测人工耳蜗中神经兴奋的空间选择性:对语音识别的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 31;11(10):e0165476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165476. eCollection 2016.
5
Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.有经验的成年人工耳蜗使用者听觉处理的电生理和言语感知测量
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jun;116(6):1235-46. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.02.011. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
6
Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.人工耳蜗使用者的时间处理与语音识别
Neuroreport. 2002 Sep 16;13(13):1635-9. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200209160-00013.
7
Effects of stimulation rate on modulation detection and speech recognition by cochlear implant users.刺激率对人工耳蜗使用者调制检测和语音识别的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2011 Feb;50(2):123-32. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.527860. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
8
Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants.刺激配置对心理物理学操作水平及人工耳蜗语音识别的影响。
Hear Res. 1997 Oct;112(1-2):247-60. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(97)00122-6.
9
Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users.人工耳蜗使用者的缝隙检测阈值与响度之间的关系。
Hear Res. 2011 May;275(1-2):130-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.12.011. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
10
Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.电极配置和刺激部位对人工耳蜗言语感知的影响。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2001 Jun;2(2):87-103. doi: 10.1007/s101620010065.

引用本文的文献

1
Speech performance in adults with cochlear implants using combined channel deactivation and dynamic current focusing.使用联合通道去激活和动态电流聚焦的成人人工耳蜗植入者的言语表现
Hear Res. 2025 Jul;463:109285. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109285. Epub 2025 May 3.
2
How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research.如何进行语音编码:使用声道语音编码器进行人工耳蜗研究。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Apr 1;155(4):2407-2437. doi: 10.1121/10.0025274.
3
Comparing Fixed and Individualized Channel Interaction Coefficients for Speech Perception With Dynamic Focusing Cochlear Implant Strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.人工耳蜗检测阈值和最大舒适响度水平的跨中心差异。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Mar;5(1):11-24. doi: 10.1007/s10162-003-3051-0. Epub 2003 Nov 20.
2
Holes in hearing.听力缺陷
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2002 Jun;3(2):185-99. doi: 10.1007/s101620020021.
3
Protection and regrowth of the auditory nerve after deafness: neurotrophins, antioxidants and depolarization are effective in vivo.耳聋后听神经的保护与再生:神经营养因子、抗氧化剂和去极化在体内有效。
比较固定和个体化通道交互系数在具有动态聚焦人工耳蜗策略的语音感知中的应用。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231176157. doi: 10.1177/23312165231176157.
4
Single-Channel Focused Thresholds Relate to Vowel Identification in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners.单通道聚焦阈值与儿童和成人人工耳蜗植入者的元音识别有关。
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221095364. doi: 10.1177/23312165221095364.
5
The Relationship Between Impedance, Programming and Word Recognition in a Large Clinical Dataset of Cochlear Implant Recipients.在大型人工耳蜗植入受者临床数据集里,阻抗、编程和言语识别之间的关系。
Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165211060983. doi: 10.1177/23312165211060983.
6
Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.利用心理物理强度-持续时间函数和电极配置评估植入耳蜗的健康状况。
Hear Res. 2022 Feb;414:108404. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108404. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
7
Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface.人工耳蜗植入者的前掩蔽恢复:年龄和电极-神经元界面的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Mar;149(3):1633. doi: 10.1121/10.0003623.
8
Acoustic-Phonetic Mismatches Impair Serial Recall of Degraded Words.声学-语音不匹配会损害对退化单词的系列回忆。
Audit Percept Cogn. 2020;3(1-2):55-75. doi: 10.1080/25742442.2020.1846012. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
9
Long-Term Influence of Electrode Array Length on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.电极长度对人工耳蜗植入使用者言语识别的长期影响。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Apr;131(4):892-897. doi: 10.1002/lary.28949. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
10
Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.电极位置对人工耳蜗植入者神经健康评估的影响。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2020 Jun;21(3):259-275. doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00749-0. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
Audiol Neurootol. 2002 May-Jun;7(3):175-9. doi: 10.1159/000058306.
4
Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.Nucleus 24高级编码器转换研究:性能与偏好
Ear Hear. 2002 Feb;23(1 Suppl):2S-17S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200202001-00002.
5
Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance.阈值、舒适水平和阻抗随电极-蜗轴距离的变化情况。
Ear Hear. 2002 Feb;23(1 Suppl):28S-40S. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200202001-00004.
6
Consonant recordings for speech testing.用于言语测试的辅音录音。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Dec;106(6):L71-4. doi: 10.1121/1.428150.
7
Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria.残余语音识别与人工耳蜗性能:植入标准的影响
Am J Otol. 1999 Jul;20(4):445-52.
8
Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation.人工耳蜗植入后影响心理物理学感知的耳蜗内因素。
Acta Otolaryngol. 1998 Jun;118(3):313-26. doi: 10.1080/00016489850183386.
9
Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.语后聋成年人工耳蜗植入受试者的电极识别与言语识别
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Dec;102(6):3673-85. doi: 10.1121/1.420401.
10
Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants.影响语后聋成人使用人工耳蜗听觉表现的因素。
Audiol Neurootol. 1996 Sep-Oct;1(5):293-306. doi: 10.1159/000259212.